Deloitte Asia Pacific profile

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Deloitte Asia Pacific profile

deloitte-250.jpg

Current trends suggest that multinational organisations will continue to spend more time and resources managing tax controversies in both their local and foreign markets. Tax authorities are sharing information about companies and are increasingly focusing on not only the technical merit of a tax position but also on its implementation.

Deloitte's tax controversy teams in the Asia-Pacific region include former tax authority officials, alternative dispute resolution specialists and, in many countries, tax litigation specialists who can assist multinational businesses at all phases of the tax controversy cycle.

Dedicated tax controversy professionals within the Deloitte network provide coverage across the region with a presence in all key markets.

Deloitte operates a global tax controversy group with leaders assigned across a number of countries. The leaders within the Asia-Pacific region are able to draw upon the connections within this community from all parts of the world, to deliver cross-border solutions in a coordinated and aligned manner.

This approach to dealing with the tax controversy-related problems of clients provides common methodologies and the development of technology-based tools used collaboratively across jurisdictions to enhance success for clients.

Deloitte in the Asia-Pacific region includes offices in more than 120 cities located across more than 20 countries, with in excess of 600 partners and 8,000 client service professionals, and forms part of one of the world's largest professional services firms, capable of drawing on multidisciplinary skills to deliver cross-border solutions to clients in local markets.

Deloitte is innovative because it has developed a coordinated network of professionals sharing insight and approaches, designed in response to trends observed over the course of the past five years.

The delivery of services and solutions within this network entails approaching problems in an innovative fashion by embedding technology-based solutions. This is done using data analytics and forensic tools to assist in large-scale reviews and audits, in conjunction with the skill and decision-making of highly experienced professionals.

Our key service offerings include:

Consulting services to help clients manage, understand and resolve complex disputes with revenue taxing authorities, including pre-audit procedures or dispute prevention, tax audits or assessments, and dispute resolution or settlement; audit readiness assessments (income, estate, gift, inheritance tax, etc.) and support for clients undergoing tax authority reviews and audits.

Recent wins:

  • Assistance in a large multijurisdictional-based dispute involving a leading pharmaceutical group.

  • Assistance to an Asia-Pacific-headquartered multinational regarding cross-border financing reviews in the consumer business industry.

  • Risk assessment reviews of an Asia-Pacific-headquartered multinational group covering more than a dozen countries.

  • Assistance on formal disputes involving cross-border financing in the oil and gas industry.

Awards:

International Tax Review Awards in the last two years:

2018 – 14 awards

  • Asia Transfer Pricing Firm of the Year

  • Asia Indirect Tax Firm of the Year

  • Asia Tax Technology Firm of the Year

  • Tax Firm of the Year: China, Japan, Indonesia, New Zealand and Taiwan

  • Transfer Pricing Firm of the Year India, Indonesia, New Zealand, Philippines, Taiwan and Thailand

  • Tax Disputes & Litigation Firm of the Year: Taiwan and Vietnam

2017 – 12 awards

  • Asia Transfer Pricing Firm of the Year

  • Asia Indirect Tax Firm of the Year

  • Tax Firm of the Year: China, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam

  • Transfer Pricing Firms of the Year: Australia, Indonesia, Japan, New Zealand, and Taiwan

  • Disputes & Litigation Firms of the Year: Cambodia

Phone: +613 9671 7370

Email: jfabijancic@deloitte.com.au

Twitter: @Deloitte

Website: Deloitte.com/tax


This document has been prepared solely for the purpose of publishing in the 2018 Tax Controversy Leaders guide and may not be used for any other purpose. This document and its contents may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person in whole or in part without Deloitte's prior written consent.

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited ("DTTL"), its global network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL (also referred to as "Deloitte Global") and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article