Updates on Brazil’s consumption tax reform

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Updates on Brazil’s consumption tax reform

Sponsored by

logo.png
Finger pointing to Brazilian flag

Gabriel Caldiron Rezende of Machado Associados comments on the latest developments related to the beginning of the Brazilian consumption tax reform test phase and considers the next steps

As previously discussed, 2026 marks the beginning of the tax reform test phase, under which taxpayers are obliged to issue invoices stating CBS and IBS at a combined rate of 1% (0.9% for CBS and 0.1% for IBS) but are exempt from paying these taxes if the ancillary tax obligations are complied with.

Nevertheless, by the end of 2025, taxpayers had expressed major concerns about the operationalisation of the new taxes, as several highly relevant regulations are still to be enacted and doubts clarified.

Clear guidance and initial relief on tax compliance

Due to the uncertainties regarding tax compliance under the tax reform, on December 23 2025, the Federal Revenue Service (RFB) and the IBS Managing Committee (CGIBS) issued Joint Act 01/2025, to address the ancillary tax obligations necessary for IBS and CBS tax compliance in 2026.

This act provided a list of existing tax documents and invoices that will be incorporated into the CBS and IBS regulations, with the necessary adaptations for stating the new taxes, and listed the following tax documents to be created by the new taxes’ regulation:

  • Electronic Invoice for Water and Sanitation – NFAg;

  • Declaration of Specific Regimes – DeRE;

  • Electronic Invoice for the Sale of Real Estate – NF-e ABI; and

  • Electronic Invoice for Gas – NFGas.

Also, and probably most importantly, the act provided that, until the first day of the fourth month following the publication of the common part of the IBS and CBS regulations, no penalties will be applied for failure to register the IBS and CBS fields in tax documents, and the requirement for a waiver of the IBS and CBS collection will be considered fulfilled.

This comes as excellent news for taxpayers as it confirms the need for relevant regulation, and grants security in view of the uncertainties, waiving penalties and further implications until said regulations are enacted.

Supplementary Law 227/2026

As previously discussed, parallel to Supplementary Law 214/2025, Supplementary Bill of Law 108/2024 was under discussion, aiming to establish CGIBS and provide for IBS administrative litigation proceedings, tax penalties, and rules related to the distribution of the IBS collection proceeds to the federal entities, among other related matters.

On January 14 2026, Supplementary Law 227/2026 was published, as a result of the approval of Bill of Law 108/2024.

With this, CGIBS has been formally created, with legal competence to, among other matters:

  • Edit a single regulation and standardise the interpretation and application of IBS;

  • Collect IBS, make the offsetting, carry out the withholdings provided for in the specific legislation and distribute the proceeds of the collection to the states, the Federal District, and the municipalities;

  • Decide on administrative disputes;

  • Work together with the federal executive branch, with a view to harmonising rules, interpretations, ancillary obligations, and procedures relating to the common rules applicable to IBS and CBS; and

  • Coordinate – with a view to integration between the federative entities, within the scope of their competences – the activities of auditing, assessing, collection, and administrative representation relating to IBS, as well as its judicial and extrajudicial debt collection.

Supplementary Law 227/2026 also set forth the much-awaited rules regarding the use of the state VAT (ICMS) credits balance remaining by the end of 2032, when such tax is abolished. These rules regulate the approval of the credit balance by the states, and its use for offsetting ICMS tax debts and IBS levied on future transactions, transfers to third parties, and its cash reimbursement.

Final comments

The RFB/CGIBS Joint Act 01/2025 provided some welcome relief for taxpayers during the uncertainties of the beginning of the implementation of the tax reform, while Supplementary Law 227/2026 enables the enactment of regulations.

It is now highly anticipated that the relevant CBS and IBS regulations be issued, shedding light on the operationalisation of the new taxes and allowing taxpayers to properly organise their activities and systems.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
The UAE accounted for most Middle East promotions and new rankings, as A&M Tax, Baker McKenzie, Dhruva Consultants and DLA Piper breached the top tier
Spanish-headquartered multinationals lead on reporting quality, while US and Swiss groups lag in the Fair Tax Foundation’s expanded analysis
Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel joins ITR for a must-listen conversation spanning his time leading the agency, his AI risk framework, and the future of the OECD
Tax and legal services was PwC’s fastest-growing business line last year, helping to put the firm back on a par with its big four rivals
Ex-EY and Hourani & Partners leader Zain Satardien is using flexible staffing and AI-enabled systems to test a leaner model for specialist legal and tax advice
The big four firm is rightfully prioritising transparency and accountability as it seeks to rebuild from its scandal, but a glaring structural issue remains
A recent hiring flurry has taken the firm’s number of partner appointments this year to 121 and put it on track to hit 160 partner target early
The move brings specialist tax and litigation capability to EY as it seeks to close the gap on Baker McKenzie and Venezuela’s leading local firms
Gift this article