Brazil’s consumption tax reform enters test phase

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil’s consumption tax reform enters test phase

Sponsored by

logo.png
Planes with Brazilian flag on their tail and emitting yellow and green smoke

Gabriel Caldiron Rezende of Machado Associados comments on the beginning of the tax reform test phase, pending regulations, and key concerns for businesses

The Brazilian consumption tax reform was a very much needed measure to lead the country towards modern and rational taxation, by implementing a VAT approach with a contribution on goods and services (CBS) and a tax on goods and services (IBS).

Even though the eagerly anticipated implementation is set to begin in 2026, there are several crucial regulations to be enacted and many concerns on the horizon.

Events leading to the current phase

With its approval in December 2023, a rather short deadline for the implementation was set, determining that the test phase is to begin in January 2026. During this test phase, taxpayers are obliged to issue invoices stating CBS and IBS at a combined rate of 1% (0.9% for CBS and 0.1% for IBS). However, if the taxpayer complies with the ancillary tax obligations, the payment of the tax will be waived.

Considering this, there were several debates during 2024 on the enactment of the first regulation of the tax reform, Supplementary Law 214/2025. Essentially, this law creates CBS and IBS, as well as the new selective tax, providing for an extensive regulation on their levy.

Furthermore, many technical studies were carried out during 2024 and adjustments to tax documents were made to allow the reporting of the new taxes.

Pending regulations

Despite the great efforts made in a very short time, several highly relevant regulations are still to be enacted and doubts clarified.

Parallel to Supplementary Law 214/2025, Supplementary Bill of Law 108/2024 is under discussion, aiming to implement the IBS Management Committee and provide for IBS administrative litigation proceedings, tax penalties, and rules related to the distribution of the IBS collection proceeds to the federal entities, among other related matters.

Supplementary Bill of Law 108/2024 has been approved by the House of Deputies and recently by the Senate, but with changes and improvements, which means it must be submitted for a revision by the House of Deputies. It is highly expected that the final approval by the House of Deputies and enactment of the supplementary law will occur by the end of 2025.

Also, additional CBS and IBS regulations must be enacted by the Federal Revenue Service and the IBS Management Committee. It is important to note that Supplementary Law 2014/2025 refers to “regulations” more than 100 times, and thus these regulations are crucial for further operationalisation of the new taxes.

Finally, many further adjustments to current tax documents and the implementation of new documents are awaited.

It is yet to be seen how the pending regulations will be addressed, especially considering that from 2027 the tax reform will enter the actual transition phase with the full levy of CBS, and thus businesses must have time to prepare.

Uncertainties

Furthermore, under the current tax system, the operationalisation of several transactions – such as sales under consignment, toll manufacturing, and distribution of samples, including rules for invoicing and procedures for tax collection – is governed by ICMS and IPI regulations. To this effect, there are currently no rules for CBS and IBS, which results in uncertainties and concerns for taxpayers.

Adjustments to tax routines are not a simple matter, and any change and/or implementation requires IT adjustments in the current digital environment, which tend not to be simple. Thus, the lack of regulation and a prediction of when such will be enacted worries taxpayers as there might not be sufficient time to be compliant with the new rules.

Also, as previously discussed, there is an imminent risk that CBS and IBS could be controversially included in the taxable bases of current taxes in 2026, even though the new taxes will not actually be charged. While some states are positioning themselves against such inclusion – and even Pernambuco recently retracted from its previous statement – other states, as well as municipalities, are still silent, which adds to the uncertain scenario.

Nevertheless, the risks will be even greater from 2027, when the new taxes will be actually charged, as there is a consensus in the government that CBS and IBS must be included in the taxable bases of the old taxes, to avoid the loss of tax revenues. Bill of Law 16/2025 was presented to address this issue and determine non-inclusion; however, it is still pending analysis.

Final comments

Although the consumption tax reform has been received favourably by the market, its implementation raises concerns and insecurities, especially regarding the timing for the absent regulations and their implementation by the government and taxpayers.

For now, taxpayers must prepare themselves as soon as possible for the existing rules, and hope for a swift legislative action by the beginning of 2026, with enough time for preparation and adjustments for 2027.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article