This week in tax: UK set to replace 130% ‘super-deduction’
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

This week in tax: UK set to replace 130% ‘super-deduction’

Closeup of the Downing Street sign in Westminster, London, UK.

British companies are waiting to hear the details of what will replace the 130% ‘super-deduction’ next week, while Spain considers stopping a major infrastructure company moving to the Netherlands.

The UK government has consulted businesses on replacing its ‘super-deduction’ with tax breaks for capital expenditure ahead of the spring budget.

UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is expected to announce a new capital allowances regime in the spring budget statement on Wednesday, March 15.

Companies investing in equipment have been able to claim a 130% tax deduction since 2021. This super-deduction cost an estimated £25 billion ($29.5 billion) in tax revenue over two years. However, the capital allowances scheme may still result in a comparable loss of tax revenue.

The Treasury has estimated that it could lose up to £11 billion a year in tax revenue from a full expensing regime. This would be £22 billion over the same two-year period as the super-deduction. But a less ambitious regime may not satisfy businesses.

Replacing the super-deduction with a capital allowances regime may be a way of winning over Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s critics and offering businesses a concession over the corporate tax increase. After all, the deduction was originally designed to offset the tax hike.

It comes as Sunak has ruled out cancelling the planned increase to corporate tax, despite pressure from his own party to do so. The UK is still set to increase its headline corporate rate from 19% to 25% in April.

Spain wants to block Ferrovial’s move to the Netherlands

The Spanish government is reportedly considering its options to stop infrastructure company Ferrovial from moving its head office to the Netherlands.

Ferrovial is planning to relocate in order to list its shares on Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange, but the Spanish government claims this is partly for tax reasons. The company maintains it is moving for greater regulatory certainty and stability.

Ferrovial plans to relocate by merging its Madrid-based parent company with its Dutch subsidiary Ferrovial International (which has been based in the Netherlands since 2018).

This type of merger might require cabinet approval to go ahead. If so, the Spanish government may block Ferrovial’s plan to move, but the company would likely dispute that the cabinet has right of approval over this transaction.

Meanwhile, the Spanish government is at odds with energy company Iberdrola and financial institutions Santander and BBVA over their windfall taxes. The clash with Ferrovial may just be one more in a growing list of conflicts with Spanish businesses.

Saudi Arabia looks at tax relief for company HQ moves

The Saudi government is looking at tax relief for multinational companies relocating their headquarters to the kingdom, according to an FT report on Saturday, March 4.

Investment Minister Khalid al-Falih has made it clear that Saudi Arabia is set to clarify its tax rules for companies moving their HQs to the country. He suggested there will be tax relief granted to special purpose vehicles used to establish such offices.

Business leaders have been concerned about the risk of double taxation since Saudi Arabia launched its regional HQ programme to encourage companies to establish an official presence in the kingdom. The government is also offering lucrative contracts to businesses moving to Saudi Arabia.

About 80 companies have already secured licences to move regional HQs to Riyadh. These businesses include PepsiCo, Siemens and Unilever. This initiative has intensified competition with the UAE, which has long been the multinational hub of the Middle East.

Next week in ITR

ITR will be following the UK budget closely for updates on corporate tax and the super-deduction. The spring budget is set to be a major fiscal event for UK businesses with a historic increase in the headline corporate rate going ahead.

ITR will also be taking a deeper look at EY’s ‘Project Everest’ and why the plan to split the firm’s advisory and audit services has stalled.

Readers can expect these stories and plenty more next week. Don’t miss out on the key developments. Sign up for a free trial to ITR.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article