International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

This week in tax: UK set to replace 130% ‘super-deduction’

Closeup of the Downing Street sign in Westminster, London, UK.

British companies are waiting to hear the details of what will replace the 130% ‘super-deduction’ next week, while Spain considers stopping a major infrastructure company moving to the Netherlands.

The UK government has consulted businesses on replacing its ‘super-deduction’ with tax breaks for capital expenditure ahead of the spring budget.

UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is expected to announce a new capital allowances regime in the spring budget statement on Wednesday, March 15.

Companies investing in equipment have been able to claim a 130% tax deduction since 2021. This super-deduction cost an estimated £25 billion ($29.5 billion) in tax revenue over two years. However, the capital allowances scheme may still result in a comparable loss of tax revenue.

The Treasury has estimated that it could lose up to £11 billion a year in tax revenue from a full expensing regime. This would be £22 billion over the same two-year period as the super-deduction. But a less ambitious regime may not satisfy businesses.

Replacing the super-deduction with a capital allowances regime may be a way of winning over Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s critics and offering businesses a concession over the corporate tax increase. After all, the deduction was originally designed to offset the tax hike.

It comes as Sunak has ruled out cancelling the planned increase to corporate tax, despite pressure from his own party to do so. The UK is still set to increase its headline corporate rate from 19% to 25% in April.

Spain wants to block Ferrovial’s move to the Netherlands

The Spanish government is reportedly considering its options to stop infrastructure company Ferrovial from moving its head office to the Netherlands.

Ferrovial is planning to relocate in order to list its shares on Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange, but the Spanish government claims this is partly for tax reasons. The company maintains it is moving for greater regulatory certainty and stability.

Ferrovial plans to relocate by merging its Madrid-based parent company with its Dutch subsidiary Ferrovial International (which has been based in the Netherlands since 2018).

This type of merger might require cabinet approval to go ahead. If so, the Spanish government may block Ferrovial’s plan to move, but the company would likely dispute that the cabinet has right of approval over this transaction.

Meanwhile, the Spanish government is at odds with energy company Iberdrola and financial institutions Santander and BBVA over their windfall taxes. The clash with Ferrovial may just be one more in a growing list of conflicts with Spanish businesses.

Saudi Arabia looks at tax relief for company HQ moves

The Saudi government is looking at tax relief for multinational companies relocating their headquarters to the kingdom, according to an FT report on Saturday, March 4.

Investment Minister Khalid al-Falih has made it clear that Saudi Arabia is set to clarify its tax rules for companies moving their HQs to the country. He suggested there will be tax relief granted to special purpose vehicles used to establish such offices.

Business leaders have been concerned about the risk of double taxation since Saudi Arabia launched its regional HQ programme to encourage companies to establish an official presence in the kingdom. The government is also offering lucrative contracts to businesses moving to Saudi Arabia.

About 80 companies have already secured licences to move regional HQs to Riyadh. These businesses include PepsiCo, Siemens and Unilever. This initiative has intensified competition with the UAE, which has long been the multinational hub of the Middle East.

Next week in ITR

ITR will be following the UK budget closely for updates on corporate tax and the super-deduction. The spring budget is set to be a major fiscal event for UK businesses with a historic increase in the headline corporate rate going ahead.

ITR will also be taking a deeper look at EY’s ‘Project Everest’ and why the plan to split the firm’s advisory and audit services has stalled.

Readers can expect these stories and plenty more next week. Don’t miss out on the key developments. Sign up for a free trial to ITR.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.