UK government under pressure over corporate tax hike

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK government under pressure over corporate tax hike

Closeup of the Downing Street sign in Westminster, London, UK.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is facing growing pressure from Conservative MPs to cancel the increase in corporate rate scheduled in April.

The Rishi Sunak government has rejected calls to keep corporate tax at 19% instead of raising it to 25%, but Conservative members of Parliament may rebel over the issue.

A government spokesperson stressed that the UK corporate tax rate is still low by international standards, adding: “To promote long-term growth, it’s vital we stick to our plan to halve inflation this year and reduce debt.”

The spokesperson added that from April, when the new threshold kicks in, the UK’s corporation tax rate will still be the lowest in the G7.

“Businesses with profits below £250,000 [$300,000] will be protected from the full rate rise, with 70% of UK companies not facing any increase at all,” the spokesperson said.

It was in response to a letter from Conservative MPs, including Iain Duncan-Smith and Mark Francois, sent to the prime minister. The letter, published by The Sunday Telegraph yesterday, February 19, called for the corporate tax increase to be cancelled in the upcoming spring budget.

“We are writing to urge you to reconsider the government’s plans to increase corporation tax from 19 percent to 25 percent in April this year,” the letter said.

“If the increase proceeds, potential new jobs and higher national output will be lost and your commendable ambition of transforming Britain into a ‘science superpower’ will be undermined. Levelling-up hopes will be hit hard,” the MPs argued.

Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca has already said it will build a major factory in Ireland instead of the UK because of the corporate tax increase.

The letter’s signatories highlighted this as one of the problems of higher corporate rates. But Chancellor Jeremy Hunt shows no sign of backing down. The UK spring budget is set to be announced on March 15 and some tax professionals expect no change on corporate tax.

Charlotte Sallabank, partner at law firm Katten UK in London, said: “The government is keen to ensure that it maintains the focus on fiscal responsibility.

“However, given the current cost of living crisis, it may be that the chancellor might announce some limited tax cuts but they would probably not take immediate effect.”

The Sunak government is expected to hold off on tax cuts until the autumn budget, but the government could still face more pressure from MPs in the meantime.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Whether it be due to a fragmented advisory market or a rise in M&A, Italy’s frenetic hiring has not gone unnoticed by ITR’s Talent Tracker
The deal gives Azets 14 new partners and boosts its Swedish revenues to over $100 million; in other news, Svalner Atlas launched in Copenhagen
The tax technology company will be providing a free demonstration of its OTP software and offering best practice advice on whether to ‘buy or build’ on September 8
Johanes Glorinus Saragih of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxes outlines the nation’s delicate geopolitical situation, as it sits between a rock and a hard place with the US and pillar two
The law firm’s head of tax, trade and wealth management likens tax legislation to a complex puzzle, recommends a sturdy coffee mug, and explains why acronyms make tax cool
The global tax and accounting firm has appointed two experienced TP advisers from a New Jersey-based boutique
A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Gift this article