Better tax policies needed to combat illicit financial flows from Africa

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Better tax policies needed to combat illicit financial flows from Africa

Edun, Wale, Nigeria finance minister.jpg
Wale Edun, Nigeria's finance minister

Countries need to build ‘tax morale’ to reduce capital flight, reports John Crabb from the World Bank Group-IMF Annual Meetings in Marrakech

Capital flight due to public distrust of national tax regimes is bleeding billions of dollars of potential revenue from governments’ coffers across Africa, ministers have warned.

They called for new policies to stop the drain of resources, at a time when interest rates are high and the continent faces a debt crisis.

All too often, those who make money in Africa move it offshore, sometimes illegally, depriving governments of desperately needed revenue.

Analysts believe such tax avoidance is exacerbated when locals believe multinationals are not paying their fair share of tax, or the government wastes it.

“The emphasis on domestic resource mobilisation is very well placed, at a time when even concessional MDB or development financing as a whole is at elevated interest rates, based on the world trend,” Wale Edun, the Nigerian finance minister, told GlobalMarkets at the World Bank Group-IMF Annual Meetings in Marrakech last week.

Widespread tax reform could help to keep money in Africa, reducing reliance on overseas aid and helping governments pay for urgently needed public services. In some countries a huge percentage of government revenue is already sequestered to service debt.

UNCTAD’s Economic Development in Africa Report 2020 said Africa could gain $89 billion annually if it curbed illicit financial flows. Luckystar Miyandazi, tax and domestic revenue mobilisation adviser at the African Union Commission, said that was around 3.7% of the continent’s GDP.

“We want to finance 75% of our development,” she said. “[African Union] Commissioner Muchanga likes to say that ‘development is DIY’, and this is what Africa wants to do — we want to own our own development, we want to finance it. We have a very young, growing population. We want simplicity and stability of international financial rules. We need to close the loopholes. It is impacting our stability.”

Francis Kairu, policy officer for tax and international financial architecture at Tax Justice Network Africa, said: “The leadership on the continent has realised that unless Africa engages in a structured manner to deal with these challenges it will face major problems, especially now, with the debt crisis that is confronting a whole new continent.”

Kairu and Miyandazi both called for a more equitable tax structure for the continent and greater recognition of its unique position in the world.

An international, binding framework convention convened by the UN, covering an extensive range of issues, would be the best option, said Nairu.

When corporations and the richest avoid domestic tax burdens, the impact flows right down to ordinary people. In 2022, Nigeria deployed revenue assurance measures to the telecoms industry, a serial offender.

“That is what we are doing in Nigeria,” said Edun. “Not only ensuring that all revenues due to the government come into the government, but that expenditures are well targeted, well spent and efficiently handled, to build public trust that utilising their tax dues, or the spending of their taxes, is efficient.”

‘Tax morale’ is a major issue in development, argued Michael Lennard, chief of international tax cooperation and trade in the UN’s Financing for Development Office.

“It’s not an easy thing because in a lot of developing countries the tax system has not been trusted,” he said. “Governments have to convince people that taxation is good for the country. If multinationals aren’t seen to be paying their taxes and are making all this profit, it is legitimate for people to ask why they should pay theirs.”

This story was first reported by GlobalMarkets and is authorised for publication on ITR.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article