UK chancellor stands firm despite AstraZeneca factory snub

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK chancellor stands firm despite AstraZeneca factory snub

AZ image.png
AstraZeneca discovery centre in Cambridge, UK | AstraZeneca

The UK’s biggest publicly listed company will build a major factory in Ireland because it believes the British corporate tax rate is too high.

UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has said he won’t consider tax cuts funded by borrowing after British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca announced a new factory will go to Ireland because it has a lower corporate tax rate.

Jeremy Hunt told the BBC on Saturday, February 11, that he was disappointed by the decision and even agreed with the company’s stance but that deficit-financed tax cuts were simply a way of passing the bill to future generations.

It came after AstraZeneca – the UK’s biggest publicly listed company – said two days earlier that it would build a new factory costing £320 million ($360 million) in Ireland, where the headline corporate tax rate is just 12.5% (though this is expected to rise to 15% in 2024).

AstraZeneca described the UK’s corporate tax rate, which is due to rise from 19% to 25% in April and will be the highest it’s ever been, as discouraging.

Former and current Conservative politicians have weighed in to criticise the UK’s approach to corporate tax policy.

Ex-Health Secretary Matt Hancock tweeted that the decision was completely avoidable and a “massive wake-up call”, adding: “Across life sciences, data, AI, clinical trials & other industries of the future, we are squandering a lead, failing to capitalise on the global success of our vaccine programme.”

John Redwood, a member of Parliament for the ruling Conservative Party, also said the announcement showed how damaging the government’s tax policy was and that “high taxes destroy jobs and result in less tax revenue”.

This row comes ahead of the government’s spring budget, which is due on March 15. Chancellor Hunt has already said there are unlikely to be any significant tax cuts in that announcement.

The UK’s corporate tax rate has been something of a political football in the past year. In March 2022, the Boris Johnson government announced a planned rise from 19% to 25% before it was dramatically reversed under Prime Minister Liz Truss in September last year.

Just before Truss departed office a month later, Hunt reinstated the 25% headline rate, saying it would generate around £18 million a year in revenue.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article