UK chancellor stands firm despite AstraZeneca factory snub

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK chancellor stands firm despite AstraZeneca factory snub

AZ image.png
AstraZeneca discovery centre in Cambridge, UK | AstraZeneca

The UK’s biggest publicly listed company will build a major factory in Ireland because it believes the British corporate tax rate is too high.

UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has said he won’t consider tax cuts funded by borrowing after British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca announced a new factory will go to Ireland because it has a lower corporate tax rate.

Jeremy Hunt told the BBC on Saturday, February 11, that he was disappointed by the decision and even agreed with the company’s stance but that deficit-financed tax cuts were simply a way of passing the bill to future generations.

It came after AstraZeneca – the UK’s biggest publicly listed company – said two days earlier that it would build a new factory costing £320 million ($360 million) in Ireland, where the headline corporate tax rate is just 12.5% (though this is expected to rise to 15% in 2024).

AstraZeneca described the UK’s corporate tax rate, which is due to rise from 19% to 25% in April and will be the highest it’s ever been, as discouraging.

Former and current Conservative politicians have weighed in to criticise the UK’s approach to corporate tax policy.

Ex-Health Secretary Matt Hancock tweeted that the decision was completely avoidable and a “massive wake-up call”, adding: “Across life sciences, data, AI, clinical trials & other industries of the future, we are squandering a lead, failing to capitalise on the global success of our vaccine programme.”

John Redwood, a member of Parliament for the ruling Conservative Party, also said the announcement showed how damaging the government’s tax policy was and that “high taxes destroy jobs and result in less tax revenue”.

This row comes ahead of the government’s spring budget, which is due on March 15. Chancellor Hunt has already said there are unlikely to be any significant tax cuts in that announcement.

The UK’s corporate tax rate has been something of a political football in the past year. In March 2022, the Boris Johnson government announced a planned rise from 19% to 25% before it was dramatically reversed under Prime Minister Liz Truss in September last year.

Just before Truss departed office a month later, Hunt reinstated the 25% headline rate, saying it would generate around £18 million a year in revenue.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

With a stark divergence between MNEs that prepared early and those rushing to catch up, advisers must remain agile with all manner of compliance risks
The EU agreed new cooperative and investigative measures to tackle VAT fraud, while Hungary faced legal action and Lavez Coutinho expanded its indirect tax team
The arrival of a team from Brazilian rival Costa Tavares Paes Advogados brings SiqueiraCastro’s tax headcount to seven partners and 30 associates
CSR initiatives can sometimes venture into virtue signalling, but Ryan’s tax literacy event for schoolchildren was a genuine and necessary endeavour
Grant Thornton advanced plans to integrate its Australian firm into its US arm, as tax developments spanned law firm hires, aviation levies and digital services taxes
A new focus on early intervention and increased AI use is transforming how tax authorities are approaching TP audits, though capacity-constrained jurisdictions risk falling behind
The French administration has used AI to detect undeclared swimming pools and verandas but always includes a human in the loop, the AI in Tax Forum heard
The UK tax authority’s deputy director of large business also reassured taxpayers that HMRC will not ‘nitpick’ returns
Sucafina’s tax chief was speaking at the ITR Pillar 2 Forum in London alongside experts from HMRC and other organisations
India’s Supreme Court rattled cross‑border structuring with its Tiger Global ruling. Subsequent rule changes narrowed the impact, but significant risks around GAAR, substance and treaty access persist
Gift this article