Two-pillar solution will lead to more tax revenues, says OECD

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Two-pillar solution will lead to more tax revenues, says OECD

Viersen, Germany - January 9. 2022: Closeup of mobile phone with

The solution to address the tax challenges arising from digitalisation and globalisation will generate more revenue than previously estimated.

The OECD Secretariat presented its updated economic analysis of the impact on tax revenue based on the latest estimates for pillars one and two, during a webinar yesterday, January 18.

It found that the increase in tax revenue from pillar two’s global minimum corporate tax rate is now expected to be about $220 billion annually (9% of global corporate tax revenues). This is based on 2018 data and compares with $150 billion a year in the previous estimate, which was published in 2020.

Pillar one – fairer distribution of taxing rights among jurisdictions over the largest and most profitable companies – is now expected to affect the allocation of about $200 billion in profits, based on data from 2021. This amounts to global annual tax revenues of $13 billion to $36 billion a year. It is a significant increase on the 2020 estimate of $125 billion.

About 50% of the profits under pillar one will come from large digital companies, such as electronics manufacturers and internet businesses.

For pillar one, the OECD has also compiled data on jurisdictional impact. This shows that, on average, low- and middle-income jurisdictions are likely to be allocated new taxing rights and will therefore gain the most. Investment hubs will face greater revenue losses, as they are likely to surrender more taxing rights than they are allocated.

The changes from the 2020 estimate are mainly due to design changes to both pillars, more recent and better data (including increased country coverage and reporting) and some changes in modelling.

David Bradbury, deputy director of the OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration based in Paris, said that the research shows that governments (particularly in developing countries) will benefit from implementing the two-pillar solution.

“I do believe this study stands head and shoulders above others that have been released to this point,” added Bradbury, saying: “What we model is very closely aligned to what has been agreed thus far.”

More than 135 countries and jurisdictions agreed the two-pillar solution in October 2021, which aims to ensure a fairer distribution of taxing rights among jurisdictions over the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises, and put a floor on tax competition by creating a global 15% minimum effective corporate tax rate.

In particular, the OECD believes the reform will stabilise the international tax system, enhance tax certainty and avert the proliferation of unilateral digital services taxes and associated tax and trade disputes, which could reduce global GDP by up to 1% annually.

In December 2022, the EU agreed to move forward with the implementation of the global minimum tax. Pillar two has also featured in budgets in the UK and Canada, while South Korea is moving ahead with its legislation. Numerous other countries have said they plan to implement it.

The text for a multilateral convention on pillar one will be opened for signature by the middle of this year.

The OECD webinar is available online and a full economic analysis and detailed methodology are expected to be published soon.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
The US president has raised India’s tariff rate to 50% because of its importation of Russian oil; in other news, firms made key international tax partner hires
Tax auditors themselves had not been aware of the new TP ‘transaction matrix’ requirements, ITR hears as five German partners share their client experiences
Its features include a built-in AI assistant as well as expert insights and commentary from Deloitte specialists
Gift this article