This week in tax: Heated debate at OECD’s digital tax consultation
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

This week in tax: Heated debate at OECD’s digital tax consultation

Numerous MNEs express their views on the OECD's digital tax proposals

Six months to agree on the pillar one and pillar two blueprints on how to tax the digitalisation of the economy still seems too ambitious based on the comments made during this week’s OECD public consultation.

Many tax professionals have been watching the public consultations held on January 14 and 15 on the pillar one and pillar two blueprints. Ahead of the live event, ITR highlighted the views of some large businesses including Unilever, Netflix, Microsoft and Uber.

Live commentary from ITR’s Josh White covered the key developments during day one of the virtual consultations where these businesses, and many others, shared their opinions on the gaps that remain. Live commentary from day two can be found here.

ITR's live blog: OECD consultation on pillar two

As the public consultations come to an end, some are already preparing for the next discussions on January 27-28. The 11th meeting of the G20/Inclusive Framework will be the next point when country representatives will try to find common ground to support a final draft.

“Many countries have an idea of what they would like to do with pillar one,” says Martin Kreienbaum, chair of the Inclusive Framework. “The difficulty is finding a consensus.”

At the Inclusive Framework meeting, leading economists will also discuss the global economic outlook and impact of COVID-19, while senior international experts will examine how tax can help deliver on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Other topics will include conversations on tax morale among businesses and how to strengthen it, the future of international taxation, taxation of the digital economy, tax certainty, tax transparency and tax administration 3.0. A further informal day of briefings on the OECD work will be held on January 29.

However, February will continue to be busy for the Paris-based organisation. On February 1, there will be a public consultation meeting to discuss the proposals for the 2020 review of the Action 14 minimum standard. Consultation responses on the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) were published on January 14 ahead of the public event, which discussed:

  • Experiences with, and views on, the status of dispute resolution and suggestions for improvements, including experiences with MAPs in those jurisdictions that obtained a deferral; and

  • How to strengthen the Action 14 minimum standard and MAP statistics reporting framework.

If these consultations are not enough to keep tax professionals occupied and discussing the future of tax policy, the EU has added to the list with its proposed roadmap to introduce a digital tax. On January 14, the European Commission's Department for Taxation and Customs Union published its proposal for a directive on the measure and is inviting feedback until February 11.

This consultation was released on the same day that the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) issued more findings into its investigation on digital services taxes (DSTs). After issuing reports on India, Italy, and Turkey last week, it said such taxes in Austria, Spain, and the UK were also discriminatory. The USTR is still looking into similar levies in a number of other countries, including Brazil, the Czech Republic, Indonesia and the European Union.

Clues on US tax plans emerge

In the US, Senator Ron Wyden, incoming chair of the Senate Finance Committee and Richard Neal, the next chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, have released their wishlist of 2021 tax changes.

In addition to plans for individual taxpayers, the two committees intend to address climate change by consolidating rules and reforming energy taxes, as well as rolling back the corporate tax giveaways in the 2017 tax reform bill, according to several news reports. Changes for multinationals could include closing the carried interest loophole, according to Forbes.

Neal and Wyden’s wishlist is supported by President-elect Joe Biden. In a speech on January 14, he said his administration’s efforts to put America on the path for a post-pandemic recovery will include “closing tax loopholes for companies that ship American jobs overseas or that allow American companies to pay zero in federal income taxes”. A full factsheet was published, which suggests tax measures affecting individuals and small businesses will happen first, after which the government will address the taxation of large and multinational companies.

Podcast: Karine Halimi-Guez, managing director of tax at FedEx, talks about cross-functional tax planning, the importance of flexibility as a leader during COVID-19, and the how the tax function can be effective during a corporate restructuring.

The UK, meanwhile, has stepped up its investigations into ‘irregular’ transfer pricing (TP) practices as part of renewed efforts to raise tax compliance. It is opening criminal investigations against corporations that have tried to deceive HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) about their transfer pricing arrangements, according to a news report in the Financial Times. The UK revenue authority is going after corporations with inconsistent TP practices, but the majority of these cases are settled with an extra tax payment.

In other news:

Next week in ITR

ITR will be providing more detailed coverage of the OECD public consultation next week, with a focus on how solving the scope and segmentation on Amount A is next step to wider agreement on pillar one.

An article by the Global Forum will also show how work on the automatic exchange of information (AEOI) initiative has progressed and how it will be developed over the coming two years.

Meanwhile, to get ahead on tax disputes, ITR will highlight the key tax and transfer pricing cases to watch in 2021 that may set a precedent and impact corporate strategies. We will also examine how tax teams are dealing with the initial impacts of Brexit, touching on issues including the rules of origin, the mutual recognition by the UK and EU of the authorised economic operator (AEO) or 'trusted trader' certification, and new technology systems being trialled at the Irish sea border.



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Alex Gerko had challenged HMRC’s positions on deferred trading profits that he and other traders made while working for hedge fund GSA
The Tax Practitioners Board had required PwC to overhaul its internal processes following the tax leaks scandal
With corporate tax rates already exceeding 15%, India will need to think creatively to extract additional revenue through new pillar two rules, local partners tell ITR
France continues to be a hot spot for tax lateral partner moves, according to ITR+’s Talent Tracker
Losses for HM Revenue and Customs and the Australian Taxation Office, cum-ex fraud and a 'mysterious funder' all feature in ITR’s list of 2024’s most significant tax cases so far
New requirements for advisers to inform clients of any relevant matters that might impact their relationship have raised concerns from a raft of professional bodies
The fallout from PwC China’s Evergrande audit has reportedly hit the firm hard; in other news, the US and Turkey look to reform their corporate tax rates
Canada risks inflaming US trade relations in a presidential election year and increasing costs for consumers, according to local experts
Dudbridge, ForrestBrown director and head of its advisory practice, FB Consulting, tells ITR about the joys of tax advisory work, what he finds most exciting about the role and what makes tax cool
A UK court rejected Tills Plus’s claim for R&D tax credits due to a lack of technological advancement
Gift this article