International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Blockchain: Favourable VAT treatment of asset transfers into a Swiss foundation

Sponsored by

There has been a rise in attention for the Swiss cryptocurrency market

Matthias Höhn and Loris Lipp of Deloitte Switzerland provide an insight into the transfer of assets to a Swiss foundation from a Swiss VAT perspective.

Initial coin offerings (ICOs) are a common and very attractive way of funding new business ventures in the crypto-market. When preparing for an ICO, the use of a Swiss foundation as owner of the underlying intellectual property, which drives the potential value of such business ventures, is very common, in particular to guarantee that the assets become legally separate from the founders. However, the transfer of assets to a Swiss foundation has to be carefully structured to avoid adverse VAT consequences under the VAT concept of acquisition tax.

In Switzerland, services (including rights) acquired from a third party located abroad are in principle subject to acquisition tax of 7.7% on the agreed consideration at the level of the Swiss domiciled recipient. In case of a transaction between related parties for no consideration, the acquisition tax becomes due on the deemed amount that would have been agreed between independent third parties (i.e. on the fair market value of the transferred asset).

For VAT registered entities entitled to the full input VAT deduction, paying the acquisition tax should not result in a cash leakage, since the tax due can be reclaimed as input VAT. However, in case the acquired services/rights relate to a VAT exempt business activity or to a non-entrepreneurial activity of the Swiss recipient, or in case the recipient is not registered for VAT purposes, the acquisition tax paid may represent a real cost.

In connection with blockchain-based software platforms, the intangible assets transferred from abroad to a Swiss foundation may easily exceed a value of several million USD and can create a substantial acquisition tax burden at the level of the Swiss foundation. However, in case it can be demonstrated that the Swiss foundation and the transferor do not qualify as related parties from a legal and economic perspective, the transfer of rights may qualify as a donation. Due to the absence of any supply, donations do not qualify as a consideration and would accordingly not trigger any acquisition tax.

The Swiss Federal Tax Administration recently confirmed in an advance tax ruling that donations of intangible assets from a foreign legal entity to a Swiss foundation is outside the scope of Swiss VAT. This applies in cases where it can sufficiently demonstrated that the foundation and the transferor (donor) are not related parties. The favourable VAT treatment of donations in this context provides an added benefit for using a Swiss foundation for an ICO or as operator of a blockchain based platform.

Nevertheless, when establishing a Swiss foundation for the purpose of transferring the ownership of intellectual property to the said foundation, it is advisable to analyse the facts and circumstances to determine whether evidence for a disaffiliation exist, in order to qualify as exempt from acquisition tax and to obtain an advance tax ruling from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration.

Matthias Höhn

T: +41 58 279 70 18


Loris Lipp

T: +41 58 279 66 72


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF has warned Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.