International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Country-by-country compliance burden could be relieved by cross-referencing says OECD public consultation

The OECD’s public consultation on transfer pricing and country-by-country reporting (CbCR) today raised the possibility of cross-referencing in a company’s master file, to help ease the compliance burden for taxpayers and authorities.

Representatives from KPMG and EY voiced their concerns over the burdensome requirements listed in the master file. Specific comments were made about the length of the document as well as the information required.

Taxpayers involved in the discussion said information is being asked for that is not necessarily relevant to certain countries, such as the reporting of global intangibles.

Ronald van den Brekel, of EY, said the master file should be limited to information relevant to transactions and that other information should be provided in the local file.

The resounding sentiment amongst taxpayers was that the master fileasks for information that is already available in other documentation. Therefore, the master file duplicates the amount of work for the taxpayer.

Joe Andrus, Working Party No. 6 secretary and head of the OECD’s transfer pricing unituntil Andrew Hickman formally takes over the role this month, asked whether being able to cross-reference specific documentation such as the US’s 10-K form would satisfy taxpayers’ concerns.

In answer, Benjamin Shreck, representing the TEI, said it would be useful for taxpayers to cross-reference in a way that does not send tax authorities on a “treasure hunt” for information.

While there is still much to discuss with regards to the master file, the secretary’s openness to cross-referencing signals a step in the right direction for reducing the burden put on taxpayers. 





more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023