International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

BEPS: Why banks cannot afford to ignore the developments

Banks may be relieved that in recent months the media focus on tax affairs has turned to the digital economy. But the OECD response via the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) action plan has momentum and could fundamentally change the tax environment that all multinational groups, including banks and other financial services businesses, operate in.

Grant Thornton's financial services tax teamrecently hosted a dinner in their Heads of Tax Club series focussing on the banking sector and discussing the above questions. The discussion was chaired by Richard Milnes, financial services tax partner, together with members of Grant Thornton’s financial services and transfer pricing teams.

A consensus feeling, at the dinner, was that banks are in a somewhat different place from other sectors – they do not benefit from some of the special regimes and reliefs that may give rise to BEPS concernsand are heavily constrained by regulation in their freedom of action (and in their bandwidth to engage in the process as they are involved in so many other sector specific issues coming out of the pace of regulatory change and the rapidly evolving developments in tax policy in relation to customers’ tax affairs).

Some of the key actions points from BEPS that banks and other financial institutions should consider in their focus include:

Country-by-country reporting: continue to seek as much alignment with, for example, the Capital Requirement Directive IVas possible;

• Particular concerns in relation to the impact of exchange of informationon client data protection and confidentiality;

• Banks should be concerned about the passing comment in the digital economy (Action 1) paper that a possible policy response may be to introduce a new withholding tax in relation to payment for digital services, because the suggestion is that the obligation for operating such a tax could fall to financial institutions involved in processing payments for such services;

• Potential changes to PE definitions in the context of cross-border provision of financial services (for example under pass porting arrangements, where the BEPS tax changes could point in the opposite direction from commercial and regulatory drivers);

• Base erosion by financial payments: ensuring that banking business models are understood and respected in any potential developments;

• Ensuring any OECD move to revisit the importance of rewarding capital as opposed to people functions still respects the importance of capital and liquidity in the banking regulatory and commercial context;

• The issue of treaty abuse is causing a great deal of concern in the context of funds and collective investment schemes, and their brokers and withholding agents. There is potential for changes in this area to make it more difficult to access treaty benefits through fund structures, even though the economic role of such vehicles is to facilitate the meeting of a broad pool of investors with a broad range of underlying investments without additional tax friction.; and

• Hybrid rules as applied to intra-group regulatory capital issuances.

By Wendy Nicholls ( and Lorna Smith ( of Grant Thornton UK.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

PwC publishes detailed accounts of its behaviour in the tax scandal in Australia, while another tax trial looms for pop star Shakira.
The winners of the ITR Europe, Middle East, and Africa Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
The winners of the ITR Asia-Pacific Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
Mauro Faggion appeared cautiously optimistic as the European Commission waits to see whether all 27 member states will accept its proposal.
The global minimum rate also won’t entirely stop a race to the bottom, according to a tax director speaking at an ITR conference in London.
The country’s tax authorities are not interested in seeing transfer pricing studies any more, it was claimed at an ITR industry conference in London.
The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.