New Netherlands agreement could open tax planning opportunities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Netherlands agreement could open tax planning opportunities

nl-curacao-handshake.jpg

The Dutch Ministry of Finance has announced that the Netherlands and Curacao have agreed the text of a new bilateral tax arrangement designed to avoid double taxation. The agreement could create new tax planning opportunities.

The agreement will introduce a 0% dividend withholding tax rate on distributions of profits. At present, the lowest dividend withholding tax rate available is 8.3%, but the zero rate will apply to dividends paid to certain active parent companies if they satisfy a limitation of benefits (LOB) clause.

“The dividend withholding tax rate on dividends paid to parent companies that will not qualify under the LOB provision will be 15%,” said Marc Sanders of Taxand Netherlands. “However, this rate will be reduced to 5% up to and including 2019 for distributions by companies to their parent companies which hold a minimum interest of 25%. Furthermore, the Netherlands has confirmed that a frequently used structure to eliminate dividend withholding tax between the Netherlands and Curacao through the use of a Dutch Coop will be respected until at least the end of 2014.”

While the 0% dividend withholding tax rate could bring about the birth of new tax planning schemes, Sanders points out that the LOB provision to be contained in the agreement is likely to limit those opportunities.

“Curacao was old-school planning in the 1980s and 1990s with a lot of structures through it. The new agreement may resurrect part of that but anti-abuse clauses are included,” said Sanders. “So the new agreement will probably not result in a major resurgence of Curacao as a tax planning location but will certainly offer new opportunities.”

The agreement – which will also see the countries engage in automatic information exchange – is subject to parliamentary procedures in both countries and is expected to become effective from January 1 2015.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
Gift this article