International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cambodia: New tax on shares gives possible glimpse of future developments


Clint O’Connell

The introduction in December 2012 of a new category of registration tax under the 2013 Financial Management Law on share transfers in Cambodian entities, gives a possible glimpse as to how the Cambodian tax authorities may deal with existing loopholes in the tax regulations regarding the taxation of shares in Cambodian entities. In particular, the Cambodian tax regime does not provide a specific income tax regime for non-resident shareholders that realise a gain on shares issued by a Cambodian company, even though capital gains on shares are, as a matter of principle, taxable income under Article 7 of the Law on Taxation:

"The taxable profit is the net profit from all the results of all types of business operations including capital gains realised during the business operation or at the close of the business."

The practical explanation as to why non-residents do not have to declare and pay tax on profit on gains derived from share transfers in a Cambodian entity is tied up with the specific operation of the Cambodian tax regime. Under the Law on Taxation, the primary way that a taxpayer can declare tax is via the submission of a tax declaration which can only be accomplished if the taxpayer is:

  1. Registered with the General Department of Taxation;

  2. Required to register by virtue of carrying out economic activity or by having a "permanent establishment" in Cambodia; or

  3. Via a third party registered taxpayer under the withholding tax regime in Cambodia.

On the face of it, a non-resident will not have a permanent establishment in Cambodia merely by holding shares in a Cambodian company. We note that at the time of writing, Cambodia has not entered into any double taxation agreements (DTA) and the concept of permanent establishment is to be found in the domestic tax regulations of Cambodia. The concept of permanent establishment as found in Cambodia's domestic tax regulations closely resembles the standard language that is to be found in most DTA's.

In addition, the withholding tax regime in Cambodia does not contemplate a withholding tax on gains that arise from the sale of shares by non-residents. As a result, no actual tax liability exists for non-residents that make a gain on selling shares in a Cambodian entity who do not have a permanent establishment in Cambodia.

Given the desire of the Cambodian tax department to increase tax revenue in the future and the additional information they will now have regarding potential lost revenue on non-resident share transfers, by virtue of the new registration tax, we believe it highly probable that this existing loophole may shortly be closed.

As per the existing withholding tax regime in Cambodia and the recently introduced 0.1% registration tax on share transfers – it would be a fairly simple process for the Cambodian tax officials to introduce a regulation that required Cambodian entities, whose shares are being transferred by a non-resident shareholder, to either withhold or be liable to pay, the resulting tax on profit that may arise on any gain that is derived in respect to the transfer.

The only questions that really remain are as to how long it will be before the tax officials in Cambodia enact this change, what will be the exact form of the change, and what, if any, notice will be given to those affected.

Clint O'Connell (


Tel: +855 23 964 430


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.