IRS Releases “Corrections” to FATCA Regulations

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IRS Releases “Corrections” to FATCA Regulations

fotoflexer-photofatca.jpg

The IRS has published "technical corrections" to the final FATCA regulations, reports Burt Staples & Maner

Although there is a reference in the preamble to "coordination," we still expect around the end of the year a substantial package of "coordination regulations" to reconcile chapters 3, 4, and 61.

While many of the changes this time around are quite minor, there are a few items that are worth noting:


Old provision

New provision

Citation

On a change in circumstances for an entity other than a passive NFFE [non-financial foreign entity], a participating FFI [foreign financial institutinon] must refresh documentation by the earlier of 90 days or the first withholdable payment or foreign passthru payment. The same deadlines apply to accounts that become recalcitrant due to a change in circumstances (other than newly high value individual accounts).

Only the 90-day rule applies. Withholdable payments within the 90 days are not subject to withholding. Caution: Change in circumstances provisions that apply to other situations (for example, withholding agents other than participating FFIs) have not been changed to drop the withholdable payment trigger.

Treasury Regulations Section 1.1471-4(c)(2)(iii)(C), -5(g)(3)(iii)

A sponsoring entity had to be able to “manage” the sponsored entity and enter into contracts on its behalf, but it was unclear to what extent.

A sponsoring entity merely must be authorised to perform FATCA compliance on the sponsored entity's behalf. Wide-ranging management or contracting authority is unnecessary.

Treasury Regulations Section 1.1471-5(f)(1)(i)(F)(3)(i), (f)(2)(iii)(B)

An example in the regulations stated that an “Investment Advisor” is a “financial institution,” but failed to explain why merely providing advice would trigger that treatment.

The facts of the example are changed to add that the Investment Advisor is managing a portion of the portfolio, an activity that clearly makes the Investment Advisor a financial institution.

Treasury Regulations Section 1.1471-5(e)(4)(v) Example 1

US branches of participating FFIs treated as US persons apply the same documentation standards as US withholding agents, and if they follow the backup withholding and reporting rules that apply to other US withholding agents, they are deemed to comply with FATCA. Nothing specific about US branches of Reporting Model 1 FFIs.

Same treatment extended to US branches of Reporting Model 1 FFIs.

Treasury Regulations Section 1.1471-4(b)(7), -4(c)(2)(v), -4(d)(2)(iii)(B)

A “branch” was defined as anything treated as a branch or as separately regulated under local law that also maintains separate books and records.

The definition is simplified by eliminating the need for separate books and records.

Treasury Regulations Section 1.1471-4(e)(2)(ii)

To qualify as a “limited branch,” the branch was required to face a barrier to FATCA compliance under local laws in place as of February 15, 2012.

The date is eliminated. The local law restriction could be passed at any time and the branch would still qualify as a limited branch prior to the end of 2015.

Treasury Regulations Section 1.1471-4(e)(2)(iii)

Limited branches had to retain required records of account documentation for at least six years.

Limited branches must retain required records of account documentation for the life of the account or obligation, but not less than six years.

Treasury Regulations Section 1.1471-4(e)(2)(iv)(B)

Certain Forms W-8 are valid indefinitely rather than expiring after three years if accompanied by documentary evidence. Unclear whether the documentary evidence needed to be refreshed.

No need to refresh the documentary evidence, so long as the Form W-8 and documentary evidence were provided together.

Treasury Regulations Section 1.1471-3(c)(6)(ii)(B)(2), (3)


Source: Burt Staples & Maner (www.bsmlegal.com)

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Indirect tax professionals now rate compliance as a bigger obstacle than technology and automation; in other news, Italy approved a VAT cut on art sales
AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
Gift this article