Brazil: Comparing systems for the taxation of profits
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Comparing systems for the taxation of profits

braz.jpg

Though most Brazilian companies are taxed on their worldwide profits at a combined rate of up to 34% (taking into account Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ) and Social Contribution on Net Profits (CSSL)), the total tax burden of these companies may vary for a number of reasons.

One such reason is the choice between the two main systems for the taxation of profits: the Actual Profit System or the Deemed Profit System.

Under the Actual Profit System, companies should apply the appropriate tax rate on accounting profits ascertained on an accrual basis according to the rules in force on December 31 2007, with certain adjustments (additions and/or exclusions) set forth by tax law.

According to the Deemed Profit System, companies should calculate the taxable profits by applying specific percentages to their gross revenues, which vary depending on the activity that generated the respective operational revenues (for example, 8% for IRPJ and 12% for CSSL on revenues deriving from the sale of merchandise and products, and 32% for both taxes on revenues deriving from the rendering of services). The company should then add other taxable revenues, including financial revenues and capital gains, and apply the 34% rate on the whole amount.

Other significant differences between said tax systems are the following:

- Tax deduction of expenses: Effective and usual expenses are tax deductible under the Actual Profit System. Companies taxed under the Deemed Profit System may not deduct expenses;

- Tax losses: Tax losses may be offset against taxable profits under the Actual Profit System (certain annual amount limit applies). The Deemed Profit System does not allow for said offsetting;

- Social Contributions on Revenues (PIS/COFINS): Companies subject to the Actual Profit System are generally obliged to follow the PIS/COFINS non-cumulative system, which subjects the company’s revenues to such contributions at a combined rate of 9.25%, with the possibility to use credits arising from contributions paid in previous transactions (several limitations apply). Under the Deemed Profit System, companies are generally subject to the PIS/COFINS cumulative system, in which the applicable combined rate is lower (3.65%), but the offsetting of credits is not authorised.

Though most companies may irrevocably choose (at the beginning of each year) the tax profit system to be adopted for that whole year, certain companies are mandatorily subject to the Actual Profit System, if they fall under the scope of the following provisions, among others:

- Engage in activities of banking, brokerage of bonds, securities and exchange, securities dealership, private insurance, factoring, among others;

- Earn profits, income or capital gains originated from abroad. The income arising from the direct rendering of services abroad is not considered as income earned from abroad;

- Enjoy tax benefits that resulted in the reduction of IRPJ; and/or

- Accrued, in the previous year, over 78 million Reais (approximately $34.5 million) of revenues, or 6,500 million Reais multiplied by the number of months in operation, for newly incorporated companies.

The previous revenue limit was of 48 million Reais ($22 million) since 2003. After several alteration attempts throughout the last ten years, recently the revenue limit was finally increased to 78 million Reais, thus allowing a substantial number of companies that were previously forbidden to adopt the Deemed Profit System as from 2014.

Brazilian companies should consider several variables and facts when making the choice for one of the available systems, such as their average profit margins, the impacts of other taxes (PIS/COFINS especially, as commented above), and timing of tax payments, among others. A wrong decision could generate considerable cost, as the option for one of the systems is irrevocable for the whole year.

Cristiane Magalhães (cmagalhaes@machadoassociados.com.br) and Stephanie Makin (smakin@machadoassociados.com.br) are members of the direct tax practice at Machado Associados, principal Corporate Tax correspondent for Brazil.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

KPMG has exclusive access to the tool for three years in the UK, giving it an edge over ‘big four’ rivals
But the US tax agency’s advice is consistent with OECD guidance and shouldn’t surprise anyone, other experts tell ITR
A survey of more than 25,000 in-house counsel reveals that diversity initiatives are a high priority when choosing external counsel
The report is aimed at helping 'low-capacity countries', the OECD has claimed
The UK tax agency appears to be going after easier, lower value targets, one lawyer has claimed
Criminal experts have told ITR that the case of Ulf Johannemann emphasises the fine line between tax avoidance and tax evasion
The ATO workers were among nearly 57,000 people who were duped into claiming fake GST refunds, while Kuwait signed a double taxation treaty with the UAE
However, ICAP may not provide the legal certainty of an APA and tax authorities will have limited capacity, experts argue
ITR+ has launched the Talent Tracker, an interactive database that collates reported partner moves across the legal tax market
The tool is available to more than 2,000 PwC tax professionals and is designed to boost client service
Gift this article