Non-US entities get first sight of beneficial ownership form for FATCA

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Non-US entities get first sight of beneficial ownership form for FATCA

fatca4.jpg

The Internal Revenue Service has published a draft Form W-8BEN-E, which overseas entities must use to certify beneficial ownership status for US withholding tax purposes under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).

Depending on which of the 22 different descriptions that they correspond to in part 1, which deals with the identification of the beneficial owner, entities are directed to different sections of the 25-part document.

Categories include foreign financial institution (FFI), non-financial foreign entity (NFFE) or variations of either, exempt retirement fund, certified deemed-compliant nonregistering local bank and excepted nonfinancial holding company.

Part II of the form allows entities to claim the benefits of the tax treaty between the US and their home jurisdiction. Part III refers to notional principal contracts “from which the income is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States”.

FATCA, which was passed in 2010 as part of the HIRE (Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment) Act, will require foreign financial institutions (FFIs) to report to the IRS about their US taxpayer-held accounts. Otherwise, the institutions and accountholders deemed non-compliant face a 30% withholding tax on certain payments such as US source interest and dividends. Proposed regulations came out in February. The Treasury’s timetable calls for final regulations to be released before the end of the summer.

Affected financial institutions called on the US government to postpone the introduction of the legislation to give them time to put the processes in place to enable to identify their US accountholders and comply with the law. Some service providers believe the institutions could end up spending hundreds of millions of dollars.

The law was originally due to come into force in full on January 1 next year, but that will now be the start of a phased introduction of the rules.

The withholding tax of 30% will be imposed beginning January 1 2014 on US-source dividends and interest paid to non-participating foreign banks and financial institutions. Withholding on all applicable payments, including US-source gross proceeds of sale and pass-thru payments, will be applied from January 1 2015.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article