Non-US entities get first sight of beneficial ownership form for FATCA

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Non-US entities get first sight of beneficial ownership form for FATCA

fatca4.jpg

The Internal Revenue Service has published a draft Form W-8BEN-E, which overseas entities must use to certify beneficial ownership status for US withholding tax purposes under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).

Depending on which of the 22 different descriptions that they correspond to in part 1, which deals with the identification of the beneficial owner, entities are directed to different sections of the 25-part document.

Categories include foreign financial institution (FFI), non-financial foreign entity (NFFE) or variations of either, exempt retirement fund, certified deemed-compliant nonregistering local bank and excepted nonfinancial holding company.

Part II of the form allows entities to claim the benefits of the tax treaty between the US and their home jurisdiction. Part III refers to notional principal contracts “from which the income is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States”.

FATCA, which was passed in 2010 as part of the HIRE (Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment) Act, will require foreign financial institutions (FFIs) to report to the IRS about their US taxpayer-held accounts. Otherwise, the institutions and accountholders deemed non-compliant face a 30% withholding tax on certain payments such as US source interest and dividends. Proposed regulations came out in February. The Treasury’s timetable calls for final regulations to be released before the end of the summer.

Affected financial institutions called on the US government to postpone the introduction of the legislation to give them time to put the processes in place to enable to identify their US accountholders and comply with the law. Some service providers believe the institutions could end up spending hundreds of millions of dollars.

The law was originally due to come into force in full on January 1 next year, but that will now be the start of a phased introduction of the rules.

The withholding tax of 30% will be imposed beginning January 1 2014 on US-source dividends and interest paid to non-participating foreign banks and financial institutions. Withholding on all applicable payments, including US-source gross proceeds of sale and pass-thru payments, will be applied from January 1 2015.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Under Jeff Soar’s leadership, WTS UK aims to scale to 100 partners within five years and challenge the big four
As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
Gift this article