COMMENT: Why Greece must develop a permanent plan for future tax reform

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

COMMENT: Why Greece must develop a permanent plan for future tax reform

greece.jpg

It is no secret that the Greek tax authorities are not exactly up to scratch. Inefficient tax collection and a lack of knowledge in specialist areas such as transfer pricing are just two of the problems preventing the government raising the tax revenue it so badly needs.

These issues cannot be resolved overnight, but what is not helping is that the Greek government seems unable to make up its mind over tax policy itself, let alone how to implement it effectively.

Since 2010, the VAT rate in Greece has risen by four percentage points from 19% to 23% and one of the coalition partners, New Democracy, recently proposed a U-turn on this, suggesting VAT be cut back to 19%.

Former Greek finance minister, George Papaconstantinou, was talking about raising withholding tax on dividends in January 2010, alongside the possibility of changing the corporate tax system.

Last month, there was an unofficial announcement in the Greek media that all political parties were in agreement over a reduction of both the corporate tax rate and withholding tax rate on dividends to 15%.

And if the Greeks themselves are unsure where they are going with their tax regime, how can the country expect to attract the foreign investment it so badly needs?

Multinationals need certainty for the tax regime if they are to invest anywhere and all of this chopping and changing is not helping anyone.

Greece needs to establish a clear tax plan to attract investment if it is to stand any hope of clawing its way out of recession.

The April general elections are hindering any immediate action about this situation but once those are out of the way, the Ministry of Finance must act quickly and decisively.

Cutting corporate tax and the withholding tax rate on dividends to 15% would be a positive step.

As would a reversal of the VAT increase which has given Greece one of the highest rates in the EU, a disastrous decision which has led to high inflation and widespread fraud, pushing individuals and businesses into the black economy.

A senior Greek tax official told the Financial Times last week “we don’t need outside help, we need better computer systems and more co-operation with other government departments.”

But surely Greece must accept whatever assistance is on offer from foreign tax administrations.

Since establishing rules for transfer pricing documentation in 2010, the Greek authorities have failed to apply them efficiently because they lack the expertise required to mount effective challenges to companies.

Bringing in foreign expertise will be vital in training Greek officials to conduct effective transfer pricing audits and this will open up an as yet untapped revenue source for the government.

Greece must establish a concrete tax plan that will help attract investment and it must stick to it.

Once it has this clear roadmap for reform, it can work to stamp out the corruption, improve the efficiency of the tax collection and clamp down on tax evasion.

FURTHER READING:

What a Greek VAT U-turn would mean for multinationals

Why Greek tax reforms will benefit multinationals

Greece plans tax system overhaul

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article