All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

New guidance for corporate tax deferral in Canada

After the publication of new proposed rules on corporate tax deferral, the Canada Revenue Agency has now issued guidance dealing with interim filing for the proposals.

The new rules will eliminate the deferral of tax by a corporation that has a significant interest in a partnership having a fiscal period different from the corporation's tax year. Bill C-13, which contains the new rules, was introduced in Parliament on October 3 and has received its second reading.

The new rules will generally apply to tax years of a corporation that end after March 22 2011, when they first unveiled by the government.

“The CRA perceived corporations were using partnerships through which they conducted profitable business in a way that meant they could defer corporation tax,” Jeffrey Trossman, a partner of Blake, Cassels & Graydon.


Before the new proposals, the rules stated that income earned by a corporation as a member of a partnership is included in the corporation’s income for the corporate taxation year in which the fiscal period of the partnership ends. If a corporation carries on a business through a partnership that has a fiscal period that ends after the end of the corporation’s taxation year, taxation of the partnership earnings can be deferred up to a year.

"The new rules limit the deferral by requiring an accrual of the deferred income," said Steve Hurowitz, a partner of KPMG in Toronto. "Transitional relief is generally provided to mitigate the cash flow impact of incremental corporate tax payable on the transition to the new rules."

This additional income will be included in a corporation’s income for a transition period of five years. However, some taxpayers are unhappy that this period is not longer. A letter from Tax Executives International, an international association of business tax professionals, in June urged Jim Flaherty, the Minister for Finance, to provide a 10-year transition period for stub period accrual.

“Moving to a 10-year transition period would ease the tax burden of clawing back the deferred income and afford companies greater flexibility in managing their cash flow,” the letter said.

"The new rules are extremely complex," said Hurowitz. "It appears that Finance’s objective in releasing such complex draft legislation is to ensure fairness amongst taxpayers. That is, it appears added complexity has been introduced with the purpose of preventing certain taxpayers from using complex structures, in particular multi-tier partnership structures, to continue to defer the taxation of income earned through a partnership. However, a number of gaps and anomalies exist in the new rules and it is likely that not all taxpayers will feel that they have been treated fairly by the new rules."

As no prescribed forms are available yet, the CRA advised taxpayers to report a partnership's income in compliance with the proposed rules and the alignment election used to change the partnership's year-end.

More from across our site

The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
The full ALP model will be adopted through a new TP regime, which is set to boost the country’s investments and tax certainty.
Tax professionals have called on the UK government to reconsider its online sales tax as it would affect the economy at the worst time.
Tax professionals have called on companies to act urgently to meet e-invoicing compliance targets as the EU plans to ramp up digitisation.
In the wake of India’s ambitious 25-year plan for economic growth, ITR has partnered with leading tax commentators to discuss what the future will look like for India and for the rest of the world.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
Multinationals are asking world leaders to put a scale on carbon pricing to tackle climate change at the 48th G7 summit in Germany, from June 26 to 28.
The state secretary told the French press that the country continues to oppose pillar two’s global minimum tax rate following an Ecofin meeting last week.
This week the Biden administration has run into opposition over a proposal for a federal gas tax holiday, while the European Parliament has approved a plan for an EU carbon border mechanism.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree