New guidance for corporate tax deferral in Canada

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New guidance for corporate tax deferral in Canada

After the publication of new proposed rules on corporate tax deferral, the Canada Revenue Agency has now issued guidance dealing with interim filing for the proposals.

The new rules will eliminate the deferral of tax by a corporation that has a significant interest in a partnership having a fiscal period different from the corporation's tax year. Bill C-13, which contains the new rules, was introduced in Parliament on October 3 and has received its second reading.

The new rules will generally apply to tax years of a corporation that end after March 22 2011, when they first unveiled by the government.

“The CRA perceived corporations were using partnerships through which they conducted profitable business in a way that meant they could defer corporation tax,” Jeffrey Trossman, a partner of Blake, Cassels & Graydon.


Before the new proposals, the rules stated that income earned by a corporation as a member of a partnership is included in the corporation’s income for the corporate taxation year in which the fiscal period of the partnership ends. If a corporation carries on a business through a partnership that has a fiscal period that ends after the end of the corporation’s taxation year, taxation of the partnership earnings can be deferred up to a year.

"The new rules limit the deferral by requiring an accrual of the deferred income," said Steve Hurowitz, a partner of KPMG in Toronto. "Transitional relief is generally provided to mitigate the cash flow impact of incremental corporate tax payable on the transition to the new rules."

This additional income will be included in a corporation’s income for a transition period of five years. However, some taxpayers are unhappy that this period is not longer. A letter from Tax Executives International, an international association of business tax professionals, in June urged Jim Flaherty, the Minister for Finance, to provide a 10-year transition period for stub period accrual.

“Moving to a 10-year transition period would ease the tax burden of clawing back the deferred income and afford companies greater flexibility in managing their cash flow,” the letter said.

"The new rules are extremely complex," said Hurowitz. "It appears that Finance’s objective in releasing such complex draft legislation is to ensure fairness amongst taxpayers. That is, it appears added complexity has been introduced with the purpose of preventing certain taxpayers from using complex structures, in particular multi-tier partnership structures, to continue to defer the taxation of income earned through a partnership. However, a number of gaps and anomalies exist in the new rules and it is likely that not all taxpayers will feel that they have been treated fairly by the new rules."

As no prescribed forms are available yet, the CRA advised taxpayers to report a partnership's income in compliance with the proposed rules and the alignment election used to change the partnership's year-end.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier for them than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Taylor Wessing, whose most recent UK revenues were £283.7m, would become part of a £1.23bn firm post combination
China and a clutch of EU nations have voiced dissent after Estonia shot down the US side-by-side deal; in other news, HMRC has awarded companies contracts to help close the tax gap
An EY survey of almost 2,000 tax leaders also found that only 49% of respondents feel ‘highly prepared’ to manage an anticipated surge of disputes
Gift this article