EU: Update on PPLs/hybrid loans in the European Union

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: Update on PPLs/hybrid loans in the European Union

van-der-made.jpg

Bob van der Made

During the May 6 2014 ECOFIN Council meeting, the EU-28 Finance Ministers could not reach political agreement on Part 1 (PPLs/hybrid loans) of the revised EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD) due to concerns by Sweden and Malta about a Greek presidency compromise text. Swedish concerns relate to a possible risk of double taxation of Swedish investment funds, for example when a foreign parent in an EU member state holds a stake in a Swedish investment company which holds shares in a big Swedish company (for example, Volvo Trucks, as mentioned by the Swedish Finance Minister in the May 6 ECOFIN meeting). In that case a dividend might be taxable for the investment company (and deductible upon redistribution to the foreign owner). Under the proposed revised PSD the redistribution dividend would be taxable at the level of the foreign owner of the investment company. If the foreign owner would hold the Volvo Trucks shares directly, then the dividend would be exempted instead under the PSD (since Volvo Trucks is not allowed to deduct dividends).

Malta has a point of principle and has a problem with the Greek presidency's last-minute compromise proposal to add to the Commission's originally proposed wording of Article 4(1)(a) which reads: "(a) refrain from taxing such profits to the extent that such profits are not deductible by the subsidiary". The Greek presidency proposes to add: ", and tax such profits to the extent that such profits are deductible by the subsidiary". However, according to Malta, EU Directives are not taxing instruments and the EC's original text was more appropriate in reflecting the taxing competences of the member states. Malta believes the same objective could be attained using different wording than the Presidency is proposing.

All member states showed a strong commitment in ECOFIN on May 6 to reaching agreement as soon as possible on the hybrid loan mismatches. Ministers decided that further technical discussions including bilateral discussions by Sweden and Malta with the Commission led by the Greek presidency should be conducted to try to reach political agreement at the ECOFIN Council of June 20 2014. If the proposed deadline of December 31 2015 for implementation of the amended PSD is to be kept within reach, however, a vote in ECOFIN on June 20, or ultimately in July under the incoming Italian EU Presidency, will be required. By May 20 this seemed a quite ambitious approach, given that the Greek presidency had still not held any of the agreed necessary talks with Sweden, Malta and the Commission, whereas the Coreper meeting (EU ambassadors' level) to prepare for the ECOFIN Council of June 20 was scheduled to meet on May 27/28. It therefore remains to be seen if common ground on PPLs can be found before the summer break.

Part 2 of the PSD proposal on anti-abuse/GAAR will in any case be dealt with under the Italian EU Presidency.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article