EU: Update on PPLs/hybrid loans in the European Union

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: Update on PPLs/hybrid loans in the European Union

van-der-made.jpg

Bob van der Made

During the May 6 2014 ECOFIN Council meeting, the EU-28 Finance Ministers could not reach political agreement on Part 1 (PPLs/hybrid loans) of the revised EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD) due to concerns by Sweden and Malta about a Greek presidency compromise text. Swedish concerns relate to a possible risk of double taxation of Swedish investment funds, for example when a foreign parent in an EU member state holds a stake in a Swedish investment company which holds shares in a big Swedish company (for example, Volvo Trucks, as mentioned by the Swedish Finance Minister in the May 6 ECOFIN meeting). In that case a dividend might be taxable for the investment company (and deductible upon redistribution to the foreign owner). Under the proposed revised PSD the redistribution dividend would be taxable at the level of the foreign owner of the investment company. If the foreign owner would hold the Volvo Trucks shares directly, then the dividend would be exempted instead under the PSD (since Volvo Trucks is not allowed to deduct dividends).

Malta has a point of principle and has a problem with the Greek presidency's last-minute compromise proposal to add to the Commission's originally proposed wording of Article 4(1)(a) which reads: "(a) refrain from taxing such profits to the extent that such profits are not deductible by the subsidiary". The Greek presidency proposes to add: ", and tax such profits to the extent that such profits are deductible by the subsidiary". However, according to Malta, EU Directives are not taxing instruments and the EC's original text was more appropriate in reflecting the taxing competences of the member states. Malta believes the same objective could be attained using different wording than the Presidency is proposing.

All member states showed a strong commitment in ECOFIN on May 6 to reaching agreement as soon as possible on the hybrid loan mismatches. Ministers decided that further technical discussions including bilateral discussions by Sweden and Malta with the Commission led by the Greek presidency should be conducted to try to reach political agreement at the ECOFIN Council of June 20 2014. If the proposed deadline of December 31 2015 for implementation of the amended PSD is to be kept within reach, however, a vote in ECOFIN on June 20, or ultimately in July under the incoming Italian EU Presidency, will be required. By May 20 this seemed a quite ambitious approach, given that the Greek presidency had still not held any of the agreed necessary talks with Sweden, Malta and the Commission, whereas the Coreper meeting (EU ambassadors' level) to prepare for the ECOFIN Council of June 20 was scheduled to meet on May 27/28. It therefore remains to be seen if common ground on PPLs can be found before the summer break.

Part 2 of the PSD proposal on anti-abuse/GAAR will in any case be dealt with under the Italian EU Presidency.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
TP is a growing priority for West and Central African tax authorities, writes Winnie Maliko, but enforcement remains inconsistent, and data limitations persist
The UK tax agency has appointed six independent industry specialists to the panel
The two tax partners have significant experience and expertise in transactional and tax structuring matters
Gift this article