AICPA urges US Senate to ratify tax treaties

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

AICPA urges US Senate to ratify tax treaties

Accountants in the US are calling on the Senate to approve the tax treaties and protocols pending before it.

In a letter to Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ), the committee’s ranking member, the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) noted that the full Senate has not approved any income tax treaty or protocol since 2010.

“Income tax treaties are vital to United States economic growth as well as U.S. trade and tax policy,” the letter said. “Tax treaties assist in harmonising the tax systems of treaty nations and in providing certainty on permanent establishment rules, a mechanism to relieve double taxation, and other key issues faced by businesses of all sizes that operate internationally.” The letter was signed by Troy Lewis, chairman of the AICPA’s Tax Executive Committee.

Lewis wrote that new treaties help the economy and boosted job creation in the US, as well as assist in the authorities in keeping up to date with international developments and enforcing the tax laws.

“The lack of action by the full Senate to ratify these treaties and protocols impedes the ability of the U.S. Department of the Treasury to keep US tax treaties in line with changes in policy and bilateral relationships,” he wrote. “Outdated tax treaties increase the potential for double taxation as well as hinder the ability of the Internal Revenue Service and foreign tax authorities to cooperate in the fair and efficient enforcement of tax laws.”

Referring to specific agreements that the committee approved in 2014, but which the full Senate has yet to vote on, the letter said the treaty with Chile would be the first with that country and the second US income tax treaty in South America. The treaty with Hungary, would bring the existing version, signed in 1979, up-to-date by closing an important loophole by inserting a limitation on benefits clause.

“This loophole currently allows nonresidents of the two treaty partners to obtain US tax benefits by inserting into their structures, Hungarian companies with no economic substance with the principle purpose of providing access to the treaty for those non-residents,” the letter pointed out.

The letter added the protocol to the treaty with Luxembourg would update how the US exchanges information with that jurisdiction and the protocol to the treaty with Switzerland “would specifically protect Americans against indiscriminate searches of information by either country by limiting the administrative assistance to individual cases. It would also bring the exchange of information article up-to-date to aid the US in combating tax evasion by US persons”.

In 2014, the committee also approved the new income tax treaty with Poland, and a protocol to the income tax treaty with Spain.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

An OECD report on taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI
Gift this article