International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Global Tax 50 2016: Brexit

Geopolitical event that has created unprecedented tax uncertainty


Brexit is a new entry this year

The narrow vote by the people of the UK to leave the European Union in a referendum on June 23 took the world – and much of the UK itself – by surprise.

The decision has set the backdrop for the most complex set of negotiations in legal history. It took Greenland three years to exit the EU – a year longer than the UK will have to navigate its exit once Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty is triggered – and most of the disputes of note in those negotiations concerned fishing.

Most people in the tax sphere hoped that Brexit would not happen because leaving the EU brings with it an almost innumerable host of questions.

It throws into question huge amounts of UK legislation, and the uncertainty this brings is one of the most potentially damaging issues a business may be forced to deal with. Worldwide, 41% of businesses are still waiting for further clarity on Brexit before assessing its broader impact, according to a recent joint survey by International Tax Review and KPMG.

Other questions that remain unanswered – and may remain unclear in 2017 – include: Will the UK retain access to the European single market, or will tariffs be placed on imports and exports? Which industries will be affected? What will happen with customs? And excise? Will the UK continue to follow the EU's VAT Directive? How will case law from the European Court of Justice apply? Could the UK stay under its jurisdiction? If not, what about cases that are still underway at the time the UK leaves? Will the UK have to adhere to the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive? What will happen to information exchange with EU countries?

While International Tax Review has written several articles on Brexit so far, the key word continues to be "uncertainty". This uncertainty, however, is not limited to the UK and EU – it has also had far-reaching consequences around the world.

"The withdrawal of the UK from the EU constitutes an event that will wield a substantial impact not only on the future of European integration but also on the international community as a whole, which is why the world including Asia is paying close attention to the Brexit negotiations," said an open letter written by the Japanese government to the UK in the aftermath of the referendum result.

The letter went on to make several requests of the UK and EU, including the preservation of pre-Brexit tariff rates and customs clearance procedures and of the 'single passport' system, which is incredibly valuable for companies in the financial sector.

Despite the uncertainty, some tax conclusions can be drawn from developments since the referendum vote.

The UK will continue to take part in the BEPS Project

The UK has been a major proponent of the OECD's Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). There is no indication that this trend will be broken. Indeed, the UK surprised many when it became the first nation to include public country-by-country reporting provisions in its laws.

Crucially, as an indicator of post-Brexit policy, this legislative change happened after the referendum, when the 2016 Finance Bill (in which the power to switch on the requirement for public disclosure of tax filings was included) was unanimously approved by the House of Commons on September 5.

Since then, Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond has doubled down on the UK's public commitment to tackling tax evasion, avoidance and aggressive tax planning, and has stressed that the UK tax gap is "now one of the lowest in the world".

However, the UK government has remained silent on whether it plans to apply pressure on its overseas territories – where a significant proportion of the world's tax planning takes place – to become more transparent.

The UK will remain an attractive place to do business

The government knows that it has to work hard to keep jobs in the UK, particularly if it were to fall into recession after exiting the EU. The country that gave the world patent boxes is more than capable of creating more quirks in the tax system to keep companies onside.

Already, it has given assurances to car manufacturers, leading to further UK investment and increasing production – though what these assurances were remain a mystery.

The UK's corporate tax rate will continue to fall

Since the Conservative Party took power in 2010, at first in coalition with the Liberal Democrats and then as the majority party in 2015, UK corporate tax has fallen from 28% to 20%.

In the immediate aftermath of the Brexit vote, then-Chancellor George Osborne – a former Global Tax 50 entrant – put corporate tax cuts at the heart of his strategy to keep Britain competitive post-Brexit, setting out plans to bring the rate down to 15%.

Hammond, his successor, confirmed in the Autumn Statement in November that the corporate tax rate will continue to fall, in line with Osborne's pre-Brexit plans, to 17% by 2020. However, no radical corporate tax cuts to 15% were announced.

In 2017, Brexit will remain an important development to watch. Prime Minister Theresa May plans to trigger Article 50 in March, which will allow the UK and EU to begin negotiating the UK's exit. What this agreement holds will not come quickly enough for the many businesses trying to plan for the change.

The Global Tax 50 2016

View the full list and introduction

The top 10 • Ranked in order of influence

1. Margrethe Vestager

2. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

3. Brexit

4. Arun Jaitley

5. Jacob Lew

6. Antoine Deltour and Raphaël Halet

7. Operation Zealots

8. Guy Verhofstadt

9. Theresa May (and the 'three Brexiteers')

10. Donald Trump

The remaining 40 • In alphabetic order

Kemi Adeosun

Piet Battiau

Elise Bean

Monica Bhatia

Allison Christians

Tim Cook

Rita de la Feria

Caroline Flint

Judith Freedman

Chrystia Freeland

Pravin Gordhan

Orrin Hatch

Meg Hillier

Mulyani Indrawati

Lou Jiwei

Paul Johnson

Stephanie Johnston

Chris Jordan

Pravind Jugnauth

Wang Jun

Jean-Claude Juncker

Kathleen Kerrigan

Christine Lagarde

Werner Langen

Jolyon Maugham

Angela Merkel

Narendra Modi

Will Morris

Michael Noonan

Grace Perez-Navarro

Platform for the Collaboration on Tax

Donato Raponi

Pascal Saint-Amans

Heather Self

Robert Stack

Tax Justice Network

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Transparency International

US Committee on Ways and Means

Rodrigo Valdés

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Developments included the end of Saudi Arabia’s tax amnesty, Poland’s VAT battle with the EU, the Indirect Tax Forum, India’s WTO complaint, and more.
Charlotte Sallabank and Christy Wilson of Katten UK look at the Premier League's use of 'dual representation' contracts for tax matters.
Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.