All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Ireland: An attractive location for investment

For many years, Ireland has been an attractive location for multinationals to set up their European hub. Ireland was a popular location for manufacturing since the 1950s and over more recent decades has attracted many multinationals centralising key functions (e.g. supply chain, intellectual property (IP) development and exploitation) as well as many companies in the financial services sector.

Ireland has had a tax policy that supports foreign direct investment (FDI) for many years. The corporation tax rate of 12.5% is a key pillar of that policy, supported by other key attractive reliefs and incentives, such as IP relief, the Knowledge Development Box and R&D tax credits, which we will discuss in further detail below.

However, there are many other reasons why multinationals set up Irish operations. Availability of talent (either in Ireland or the ability to attract talent from across the EU, which is particularly the case in the technology and social media area), much improved infrastructure, the ease of access to North America and Europe, time-zone, improved cost competitiveness, together with being an English-speaking member of the Eurozone all contribute to Ireland's attractiveness as a location for investment.

In light of the overall attractive package that Ireland offers, it is unsurprising that Ireland is home to nine of the world's top 10 pharmaceutical companies, nine of the world's top 10 global software companies and all of the top 10 "Born on the Internet" companies.

Intellectual property reliefs

Many multinationals, particularly those in the technology/social media and life science industries have operations in Ireland exploiting worldwide/non-US IP rights. There are a variety of offshore and onshore IP holding platforms used by these multinationals.

In recent years, there have been some changes to the Irish corporate tax residence rules, with the aim of protecting Ireland's reputation, particularly given the ever-increasing focus on the "double Irish" structure. Due to those changes, all companies incorporated in Ireland on or after January 1 2015 will be treated as resident in Ireland for tax purposes. There is one exemption (treaty exemption) to this rule, whereby a company that is regarded as resident in a country with which Ireland has a double taxation agreement (DTA), will be considered as a resident of that other country under the terms of that DTA. Grandfathering provisions were also introduced so that companies incorporated on or before December 31 2014 may continue to be treated as non-Irish residents until December 31 2020, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

IP amortisation

Given the favourable onshore IP regime (i.e. tax relief for the amortisation of qualifying IP) and the increased focus of aligning profits with substance, we expect a significant number of multinationals to bring their IP onshore to Ireland over the next few years as many of those multinationals have their European/non-US principal companies located in Ireland with significant functions undertaken in Ireland. Also, we continue to see new entrants using Ireland as a gateway to Europe. A number of these companies are locating their IP, as well as certain key functions, in Ireland.

Knowledge Development Box

The Knowledge Development Box (KDB) was introduced last year and is available to companies for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1 2016. The KDB provides for a 6.25% effective rate of corporation tax on qualifying profits related to qualifying IP assets which are the result of qualifying R&D activities carried out by the Irish company. Qualifying IP assets for the purposes of the KDB are, namely, patents and copyrighted software. As the KDB is based on the OECD modified nexus approach, in order for the IP to qualify, the R&D giving rise to the IP must have been carried out in Ireland or outsourced to a third party.

A number of multinationals carry out R&D activities in Ireland entitling them to generous R&D tax credits (25% credit for qualifying expenditure, which is refundable in certain circumstances). The R&D activities carried out in Ireland, however, may be insignificant in the overall scale of R&D activities carried out globally (e.g. in the US or India) to develop the group's IP. However, where significant R&D is taking place in Ireland or where it is outsourced to third parties (e.g. clinical trials in the life sciences industry), there may be an opportunity to claim the KDB.

Competitive IP regimes have been a feature of many countries in recent years. However, given Action 5 of the OECD BEPS Project, other countries have to amend their regimes to become OECD compliant as previous regimes are no longer available to new entrants from June 30 2016. It will be important for the KDB to remain competitive as new regimes are introduced in other countries and that it is enhanced, as necessary.


Attracting and retaining talent is vital to Ireland's competitiveness as a location for FDI. In particular it will be even more important in a post-BEPS environment given the increased focus on substance. Being home to Europe's youngest population as well as most of the top multinationals across a number of industries, Ireland has developed and attracted talented individuals from across the world, but from Europe in particular. However, increases in the personal tax rates during the recession years provide some challenges.

The Irish Special Assignee Relief Programme (SARP) regime was introduced a few years ago to provide a more attractive income tax regime for foreign employees assigned to Ireland. In addition, recent reductions in the rates of the Universal Social Charge (USC) for individuals are welcome in helping to reduce the overall effective rate of personal tax in Ireland for employees in all sectors, including the multinational sector. As signalled by the Minister for Finance, more needs to be done in this area so that Ireland continues to succeed in attracting senior executives to work in Ireland and we hope to see further reductions over the next few years.

International landscape

The OECD BEPS Project issued final papers across many of the actions in October 2015 although further work continues in some areas. Ireland has engaged constructively with the BEPS process. As mentioned above, some changes to our corporate tax residence rules were introduced in 2013 and 2014. However, there are a number of other important elements of the international landscape that may have an impact on Ireland:

  • The EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) finalised in June 2016 includes a number of provisions (e.g. interest deductibility restrictions and controlled foreign company (CFC) rules) that will need to be introduced into Irish law in the coming years. We expect a public consultation process to be introduced by the Irish Department of Finance next year to seek views on how the ATAD provisions should be implemented in Ireland;

  • Recent EU state aid decisions regarding Ireland and other EU member states have further increased media and public focus on international tax matters. Protecting Ireland's reputation is paramount;

  • Over the coming months, the UK authorities are likely to try to provide reassurance and bolster public and business sentiment following the UK's decision to exit the EU (Brexit). Indeed, it has already been indicated that in order to offset any slowdown in the UK market, the UK will actively pursue tax strategies to attract and retain FDI. In particular, a further potential reduction in the corporate tax rate to 15% has been mentioned. In addition, if the UK leaves the EU, in the absence of state aid rules, it has been suggested that the UK may have additional flexibility to introduce more targeted tax and other incentives to attract investment. In our view this may be restricted to some extent, given the UK's commitment to the OECD's BEPS process, and driving the agenda around international tax reform at the G8;

  • While Brexit will not result in any change to the Irish tax regime, in terms of FDI, a strong focus must be placed by the Irish government on ensuring that Ireland continues to have a pro-business tax regime that is competitive with what is on offer in the UK (and indeed elsewhere). The certainty and ongoing commitment to the 12.5% tax regime remains a key factor in influencing the attractiveness of Ireland vis-à-vis other locations when assessing the tax implications; this is in contrast to other jurisdictions, where concerns remain that a change of government and tax policy approach could see a u-turn on lower corporate tax rates and other tax policies. Therefore, the certainty that Ireland delivers around its tax rate, reputation and tax regime is of paramount importance; and

  • From a financial services perspective, a critical issue for financial services companies is the ability to passport their operations from a regulatory perspective seamlessly from one EU location to another, under EU regimes. Given that these passporting rights may be lost post-Brexit, some companies are now considering the need to relocate some UK-based operations to ensure continuity of service. Ireland has proven to have the right infrastructure to support UK financial services businesses considering expanding or establishing an EU footprint.

In response to changes in the global tax framework, companies across the world are reviewing their global operations to ensure that they comply with both EU and OECD standards. As a result, it is vital that Irish government policy continues to support initiatives that help Ireland remain an attractive destination for investment, and to do so in a way that is compatible with the priorities established under the OECD BEPS Project and the EU ATAD. Ireland remains committed to the 12.5% corporation tax rate. The benefits of that very competitive rate should not be under-estimated at a time where multinationals appreciate a sustainable low corporation tax rate without any "exotic" tax planning. However, as mentioned above, clearly, Ireland's tax regime is only one element of Ireland's offering in terms of attracting FDI. Therefore it is important that Ireland's cost competitiveness is retained and even improved and that the government supports increased availability of both commercial office space and residential housing and further invests in the pipeline of graduates in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) subjects.




Lorraine Griffin and Louise Kelly
Deloitte Ireland

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Energy ministers agreed on regulations including a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies to address high gas prices at an extraordinary Council meeting on September 30.
The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree