International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Croatia: Agreement on double taxation avoidance signed with Japan

Sponsored by

Eurofast Croatia

Croatia and Japan celebrated their 25th anniversary of diplomatic relations in 2018. This milestone was further marked with the signing of an agreement on double taxation avoidance (DTA) on October 19 2018. The official document was concluded in English and is yet to be ratified and enforced by the respective states.

The relationship between Croatia and Japan shows signs of steady cooperation, mutual interest and friendship. With the recent signing of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Japan, the two countries are one step closer towards further strengthening their economic cooperation.

Croatia's exports to Japan increased by 55% in 2017, whereas the overall exchange of goods reached $86 million. Croatia mainly exports fish, high quality wood and food such as wine and truffles, while Japan exports to Croatia mostly machinery, appliances and cars. Both countries agreed that there is more room for improvement regarding Japan's investment in Croatia, and the economic exchange in general. The DTA will surely help to remove barriers and achieve such a goal.

The agreement generally follows the standard structure and principles of the OECD's Model Tax Convention, and applies to profit, income and surtax on income tax in Croatia, and income, corporate, special income tax for reconstruction, local corporation tax, and local inhabitant taxes in Japan.

The agreement specifies that taxes on income comprehend all taxes imposed on total income or on elements of income, including taxes on gains from the alienation of any property, taxes on the total amounts of wages, or salaries paid by enterprises. It also includes taxes on capital appreciation. The maximum withholding tax rates between the two countries are agreed as follows:

  • 5% on dividends (however, it is exempt if the company which directly or indirectly owns at least 25% of the voting power of the company paying the dividends throughout a 365-day period);

  • 5% on interest (however, it is exempt if the beneficial owner of the interest is a governmental body, local authority, central bank or similar); and

  • 5% on income from royalties.

The agreement defines in detail all relevant terms such as resident, permanent establishment, business profits, associated enterprises, silent partners, pensions, dividends, interest, royalties, capital gains, income from employment, income from immovable property, director's fees, entertainers and sportspersons, students and so on, overall removing a significant portion of misinterpretation or misuse of the information contained therein.

Taxation not in accordance with the provisions of the agreement shall be resolved by mutual agreement between the tax authorities of the two countries. Both countries have also committed to an efficient exchange of information aimed at the prevention of international tax evasion and tax avoidance, in addition to mutually lending assistance in the collection of tax claims.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.