Switzerland: A closer look at notional interest deduction in the canton of Zurich

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: A closer look at notional interest deduction in the canton of Zurich

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
NID was officially introduced into tax law on January 1 2020

René Zulauf and Loris Lipp of Deloitte explain why it would be worthwhile to analyse the application of notional interest deduction in the canton of Zurich.

Notional interest deduction (NID) was officially introduced into tax law on January 1 2020. The Swiss tax reform enacted then allowed cantons with a higher tax rate to apply the NID at cantonal and communal level. It is currently only being applied in the canton of Zurich.  

The NID qualifies as a tax-deductible expense for cantonal and communal taxes and is calculated by multiplying the so-called safety equity by the imputed interest rate.

Safety equity

Safety equity equals the difference between the total equity according to the Swiss statutory accounts and a minimum equity which is determined by applying a mechanical asset test (i.e. each asset on the balance sheet must be underpinned by a certain equity quota based on its average value during a business year and the resulting values are subsequently aggregated).

Imputed interest rate

For the sake of simplicity, the imputed interest rate shall equal the interest rate on a 10-year Swiss government bond. A variable interest rate may apply in line with the arm’s length principle on the safety equity attributable to intercompany receivables (i.e. including cash pool, short- and long-term receivables but exclusive of trade receivables).

Current environment

In the current interest rate environment, the NID provides a benefit mainly in cases where a company’s assets predominantly consist of intercompany receivables, such as in the case of finance companies or finance branches.

The NID should neither be qualified as harmful with regard to anti-hybrid mismatches (BEPS Action 2) nor as a tax practice itself (BEPS Action 5). Furthermore, the EU commission has recently closed the public consultation on the introduction of a debt-equity bias reduction allowance (DEBRA) for tax purposes and intends to adopt a respective directive, underpinning the general acceptance of the NID within the EU and probably the majority of the OECD, too.

For financing in the EU it may therefore be worthwhile to analyse the application of the NID in the canton of Zurich, particularly given that the EU commission has agreed to the introduction of an NID across the EU.

René Zulauf

Partner, Deloitte Switzerland

E: rzulauf@deloitte.ch 

Loris Lipp

Manager, Deloitte Switzerland

E: llipp@deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The flagship 2025 tax legislation has sprawling implications for multinationals, including changes to GILTI and foreign-derived intangible income. Barry Herzog of HSF Kramer assesses the impact
Hani Ashkar, after more than 12 years leading PwC in the region, is set to be replaced by Laura Hinton
With the three-year anniversary of the PwC tax scandal approaching, it’s time to take stock of how tax agent regulation looks today
Rolling out the global minimum tax has increased complexity, according to Baker McKenzie; in other news, Donald Trump has announced a 25% tariff on countries doing business with Iran
Among those joining EY is PwC’s former international tax and transfer pricing head
The UK firm made the appointments as it seeks to recruit 160 new partners over the next two years
The network’s tax service line grew more than those for audit and assurance, advisory and legal services over the same period
The deal is a ‘real win’ for US-based multinationals and its announcement is a welcome relief, experts have told ITR
Tom Goldstein, who is now a blogger, is being represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson
In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Gift this article