Switzerland is no tax haven but may be a 'tax paradise'?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland is no tax haven but may be a 'tax paradise'?

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
US president Biden labelled Switzerland as a tax haven in his state of the union address

René Zulauf and Manuel Angehrn of Deloitte Switzerland discuss why Switzerland can never really be described as a tax haven.

US president Joe Biden labelled Switzerland as a tax haven in his state of the union address, comparable to Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. Switzerland has never really truthfully been called a tax haven in the past, much less so since Switzerland phased out its special corporate tax regimes in 2019 and has been fully compliant with international tax standards ever since.

Contrary to tendencies observed on a global level, in particular in the EU and the US, Switzerland, while amending its tax legislation to meet international standards, kept it sane and simple, adding additional benefits, such as R&D incentives. Switzerland approached the challenges of COVID-19 with comparatively limited restrictions of business activity and individual freedoms. 

What is more, the Swiss government responded with a legislative package in an attempt to decrease the tax and regulatory burden for businesses in the future and to provide incentives for various industries. Among others, the Swiss parliament currently discusses the abolishment of Swiss withholding tax on bond interest and the abolishment of the securities transfer tax to further bolster financing operations in Switzerland and the financial industry. 

On the incentive side, the introduction of a tonnage tax for the shipping industry is in discussion (It may be little known that Switzerland, although small and landlocked, has a sizeable shipping industry). 

As another example, the canton of Zug, which has already one of the lowest tax rates among Swiss cantons, will reduce the tax rate due to COVID-19 temporarily further in years 2021–23 to mitigate the economic impact of the pandemic for taxpayers. This reduces the corporate headline tax rate in the city of Zug for instance to only 11.79% (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate) in these years.

The business-friendly attitude of Swiss government and of Swiss authorities is among others a consequence of direct democracy. The fact that Swiss citizens can essentially vote on legislative changes, either directly or via a referendum, keeps government in check and ensures that the government is actually there for the people and not vice versa. 

Equally, a healthy tax competition between the cantons, which are free to set their own tax rates, ensures competitive tax rates and a friendly treatment of taxpayers. In Switzerland, taxpayers are generally appreciated as business partners, rather than seen as mere taxable subjects.  

Admittedly, Switzerland needs competitive tax rates to compensate for the otherwise high cost of doing business. But then, paradise is never cheap.

René Zulauf

Partner, Deloitte Switzerland

E: rzulauf@deloitte.ch


Manuel Angehrn

Senior Manager, Deloitte Switzerland

E: maangehrn@deloitte.ch

 

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Gift this article