Thailand deliberates transfer pricing law

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Thailand deliberates transfer pricing law

Thailand’s Council of State is deliberating the country’s first law on transfer pricing. If passed the bill would allow Thailand Revenue Department (TRD) officials to enquire into profits from cross-border transactions of multinational companies.

The final draft of the law was approved by the Cabinet in May this year. It was created in line with OECD guidelines.

Thailand has no specific anti-avoidance legislation. The only provision in place is a Departmental Instruction (No.Paw 113/2002), which states that a company operating in Thailand must calculate its net profit for corporate tax in accordance with section 65 of the Thai Revenue Code.

The new law would require companies to provide transfer pricing documentation to the TRD within 150 days after the end of the accounting period. Failure to do would result in a penalty of up to Bt400,000 ($12,000).

“We cannot now say what date the law will be effected ,” said Benjamas Kullakattimas, tax partner at KPMG in Thailand. “If the law is issued this year though, it is possible the TRD will want the taxpayer to start providing transfer pricing documentation from the 2015 tax year, due May 30 2016.”

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Partner payouts could also be reduced by a fifth, it has been reported
Gift this article