Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Editorial

On the face of it, indirect tax is the better option for companies. Unlike direct taxes on their profits, taxes on consumption can, for the most part, be passed on. As such, companies around the world have welcomed a global trend of falling corporate tax rates offset by higher rates of VAT/GST.

But indirect taxes do pose compliance challenges for companies, which must change the prices they charge for goods and services and update their systems accordingly. As such, above all, taxpayers want to see certainty.

In China, with the VAT pilot being rolled out nationwide, and in Europe, with reforms in 2015 to make the system simpler, more efficient and more robust, taxpayers are getting just that.

But the indirect tax landscape is not quite so certain everywhere. In India, GST implementation continues to face delays because of disagreements between the central government and the states.

Meanwhile, in Australia, the election of a new right-wing government led by Tony Abbott was supposed to bring the certainty of the carbon and mining taxes being scrapped. But with the Green Party still holding the balance of power and committed to the environmentally-friendly carbon pricing mechanism, it does not look as though the new government will be able to immediately achieve its objectives.

Attempting to bring a little more clarity to the ever-changing world of indirect tax, this year's Indirect Taxes supplement from International Tax Review has EY addressing some of the challenges multinational companies face, especially in rapid-growth markets.

ATOZ – Taxand sheds light on the basic principles concerning the VAT situation of holding companies in Luxembourg and their right to recover input VAT.

KPMG takes a look at the proposed VAT reforms in Mexico, at the VAT burden on infrastructure supplies to public authorities in Romania, and at the GST compliance landscape in Singapore.

Deloitte looks at VAT reform in China, while in Germany, küffner maunz langer zugmaier examines a recent case and its impact on partnerships as controlled members of a VAT group.

Indirect Taxes is now in its 11th year. And with indirect taxes continuing to expand across the world, we expect this supplement to be around for many years to come.

Salman Shaheen

Editor

International Tax Review

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article