Reduction of monthly tax payments in Mexico

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Reduction of monthly tax payments in Mexico

fotoflexer-photomexicoflag50.jpg

In a global economic environment in which cash and short term resources are an important objective for most businesses, it is important to be aware of available tax incentives.

In this regard, the Mexican tax law allows taxpayers to reduce monthly income tax payments. You get this benefit by requesting authorisation from the tax administration as from the second semester of the fiscal year, to avoid a potential financial cost of tax payments that may represent favourable balances.

The Mexican Income Tax Law states that taxpayers are required to make advance annual tax payments not later than the 17th day of the month subsequent to the one to which the payment refers.

In Mexico, the calculation of the monthly tax payment is determined, in general terms, by a profit ratio based on the results of the preceding year. Therefore, the monthly income tax payments may be totally dissociated from the year´s taxable income for several reasons, such as lower sales, investment in fixed assets or new projects or just because of cyclical types of businesses.

To claim a reduction, taxpayers’ formal request should be filed anytime from July 1, though no later than a month before the date in which the reduction is intended to apply, and to the extent that the corresponding requisites are fulfilled.

Daysi Ruiz (daysi.ruiz@mx.ey.com), David Vanegas (david.vanegas@mx.ey.com) and Gustavo Gómez (Gustavo.gomez@mx.ey.com)

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article