Montenegro: Montenegro regulates taxation of hydrocarbon production activities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Montenegro: Montenegro regulates taxation of hydrocarbon production activities

zivkovic.jpg

Jelena Zivkovic

On the February 1 session of the Montenegrin government, the goverment adopted the Draft Law on Taxation of Hydrocarbons, whereby tax policies on profit gained from extracting oil and gas, construction of facilities and related equipment as well as delivery and transport of oil and gas have been defined. The proposed law, when ratified by the Parliament, will create a special regime for corporate income tax applicable to companies dealing with extracting oil and gas. Per the new law, the corporate income tax rate will be 59%.

The proposed law introduces liability of payment of corporate income tax on profits gained from upstream operation related to hydrocarbons. The law will be applicable to upstream operations undertaken on the Montenegrin Sea and in international waters where Montenegro has the right of exploitation in line with international agreements. Also, the law will be applicable to the transport of hydrocarbons.

In accordance with the law, a taxpayer is a locally registered company or a foreign company's branch that is undertaking upstream operations based on a Concession Agreement with the Montenegrin government as well as other parties undertaking upstream activities in line with international agreements.

The draft law defines the following revenue as revenue of upstream operations:

  • Revenue of production, transport, sale and realisation of hydrocarbons;

  • Revenue of interests and other financial revenues, exchange rate difference as well as financial gain of upstream operation;

  • Revenue gained from tangible assets purchased for use in activities of upstream operation; and

  • Value of hydrocarbons stock.

The defined eligible expenses include upstream capital expenses, operational expenses, expenses of reinstallations funds, and financial expenses.

Revenue gained from other activities of the company that are not regulated by this law such as capital gains (including gains of transfer of concession rights for production of hydrocarbons) will be subject to taxation per Law on Corporate Income Tax with a standard corporate income tax rate of 9%.

The goverment plans to direct 20% of tax revenues from upstream activities to the Montenegrin budget, while 80% will be allocated to a special fund, which will be used for funding development projects of national interest.

Jelena Zivkovic (jelena.zivkovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Podgorica Office

Tel: +382 20 228 490

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article