Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Editorial

There is no such thing as a quiet year for China's tax system.

The fifth edition of KPMG's China – Looking Ahead guide shows that all parts of the system covered in previous versions of this publication underwent change in 2015 and more is on the way. For example, Announcement 7 has replaced Circular 698 as the definitive word on the reporting and taxation of indirect offshore disposals, the Special Tax Adjustments discussion draft, covering new transfer pricing guidance and controlled-foreign-company rules, is expected to be finalised before the end of the year, and the transition from Business Tax to a national VAT is expected to be completed in 2016.

Many of the changes are, of course, inspired by, if not taken directly from, the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan, whose final recommendations came out in September 2015. China will have a particularly important role to play in the implementation of the plan in 2016 as president of the G20 group of the world's biggest economies, which commissioned the OECD to reform the international tax system in 2012.

China will be in the global tax politics and diplomacy spotlight for another reason next year. It hosts the next meeting of the OECD-organised Forum on Tax Administration, when more than 100 tax commissioners from around the world will meet in Beijing to discuss ever-constant priorities such as how they can cooperate more and better, and how to resolve disputes quicker and more efficiently.

China wants to use these responsibilities to make a real impact on international tax, but it reserves the right, as it has made clear many times previously, to sculpt any measures according to the needs of its own tax system and economy. For example, it has decided not to adopt, for now, the BEPS proposals on interest deductions and value chain apportionment, the SAT's new transfer pricing method, is nowhere to be seen in the BEPS action plan.

So what does this all mean? It means, to borrow a phrase from a different time, an international tax system in China with Chinese characteristics. It is a situation that taxpayers everywhere will have to monitor closely and we hope the fifth edition of KPMG's China – Looking Ahead will be a valuable tool in helping them do this.

Ralph Cunningham

Managing editor

International Tax Review

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article