EU Council agrees on ‘quick fixes’ for intra-community transactions on goods and domestic VAT fraud

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU Council agrees on ‘quick fixes’ for intra-community transactions on goods and domestic VAT fraud

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
EU Council agrees on quick fixes

On October 2 2018, the EU Council agreed to adopt several proposals from the European Commission to reform the EU VAT system. These proposals included four 'quick fixes' to the prevailing regime that will apply to improve the functioning of the existing VAT system, pending the introduction of the 'definitive' VAT system that is still the subject of continuing discussion.

The following measures will become effective on January 1 2020:

  • The first measure relates to the VAT exemption on intra-community supplies of goods, i.e. goods dispatched or transported from one EU member state to another member state. In particular, sellers can face difficulties when confronted with contradictory requests for proof of transport by the different member states. The EU Council has agreed on common evidence the seller must maintain to prove the intra-community transport to be able to exempt these supplies. Thus, tax administrations in the EU no longer should require evidence not included in this list.

  • The second measure relates to 'call-off' stock, i.e. a stock of goods owned by a seller where a buyer can take and use the goods as needed for its own activities. If the stock owned by the seller is located in another member state, the seller generally must register for VAT in that state and charge local VAT to its customer. Some but not all member states provide an exemption from registration and shift the payment of VAT to the customer. Under the new rules, all member states will be required to apply this regime, thus shifting the payment of VAT to the buyer of the goods.

  • The third quick fix relates to chain transactions, i.e. successive supplies of goods that are made via a single intra-community transport. This transport can be ascribed to only one supply, and only this supply can be VAT-exempt as an intra-community supply, which often leads to difficulties for taxpayers. Under the new rules, the transport will be ascribed to the first supply in the chain, i.e. the sale from the first seller to an intermediary. However, if the intermediary is registered in the member state of the first seller and has properly communicated its VAT number, the intra-community transport will be ascribed to the last supply in the chain, i.e. the sale made by the intermediary to the final buyer. It should be noted that the new rules address chain transactions with only one intermediary.

  • The fourth measure is reserved for member states experiencing substantial VAT fraud (e.g. Greece, Italy, Poland and Romania, among others). Under strict conditions, these member states may introduce a temporary 'general reverse charge mechanism' for all local supplies of goods or services valued at greater than €17,500 ($20,000) between persons registered for VAT in their member state. Under this mechanism, sellers and service providers no longer will have to charge VAT to their customers; instead, the customers will have to pay the VAT directly to the national treasury.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
Gift this article