Albania: Albanian transfer pricing regulations

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Albanian transfer pricing regulations

intl-updates-small.jpg

Transfer pricing (TP) rules have been present for more than a decade in the Albanian Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Law, but specific and detailed regulations on the application of these rules were only published in the Official Journal No. 70, dated May 20 2014. These changes have totally transformed Article 36 of the Law on Income Tax (No. 8438, dated December 28 1998) by adding seven more provisions on specific rules and actions.

likaj.jpg
sagianni.jpg

Drilona Likaj

Anastasia Sagianni

Companies and groups of companies with related party transactions must comply with the revised TP rules, and failure to do so can lead to hefty fines.

An entity is considered a related party if there is a possibility of exercising control over or exerting considerable influence on the business decisions made. The direct or indirect possession of 50% or more of the shares in capital mean that control over the taxpayer is possible, while owning at least 50% of the voting rights is considered as having an influence on business decisions.

The types of transactions subject to TP rules include:

  • Product sales;

  • Product acquisitions;

  • Lendings;

  • Borrowings;

  • Royalties;

  • Management fee payments;

  • Provision of management services;

  • Cost-sharing within the group;

  • Research and development activities;

  • Provisions for other services; and

  • The use of other services.

TP methods

Taxpayers should choose one of the methods described in the OECD's TP Guidelines when engaging in transactions with a related party. A taxpayer should also describe the decisive reasons for the determination regarding the method used for the reconciliation of the transfer prices with the arm's length principle for the transactions carried out with the associate enterprises.

The taxpayer should choose one of the following TP methods:

  • The comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method;

  • The resale price method (RPM);

  • The cost plus method (CPM);

  • The transactional net margin method (TNMM); or

  • The profit split method (PSM).

Taxpayers can use another method only when none of the above methods can be reasonably applied.

TP audits and penalties

TP documentation must be submitted to the tax authorities in Albania on an annual basis by filling a "controlled transaction notice". It may be submitted in hard copy along with the balance sheet and the financial statements or electronically, as required by the tax authority.

In the case of a potential tax audit, the tax administration is obligated to perform the same transfer pricing method used by the taxpayer.

It is worth noting that TP penalties were only introduced in Albania less than a decade ago. Article 115/1 was introduced into Law No. 9920 on May 19 2008 "On Tax Procedures" to impose penalties relating to TP. Before this change, no provisions or penalties regarding TP were in force.

Drilona Likaj (drilona.likaj@eurofast.eu) and Anastasia Sagianni (anastasia.sagianni@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast

Tel: + 355 (0) 42 248 548

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Gift this article