Mexico: Limitation on income tax deductions affecting international transactions
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Limitation on income tax deductions affecting international transactions

cuellar.jpg

solano.jpg

David Cuellar


Claudia Solano

As part of the tax reform package in force as from January 1 2014, the Mexican tax authorities established new provisions ruling the deductibility of certain disbursements made by Mexican taxpayers. These limitations seem to be the first step taken by the Mexican tax authorities to align their efforts to the recommendations and action plan issued by the OECD as concerns the BEPS initiative.

As an example, the following provisions describe some of the limitations established by the Mexican tax authorities that may have an impact on entities carrying out international operations:

In terms of technical assistance, interest and royalty payments made to a foreign party that controls or is controlled by the Mexican entity, such payments would not be deductible when and to the extent that:

  • The company receiving the payment is considered to be transparent in terms of the Mexican Income Tax Law, except when the shareholders or associates of the foreign recipient are subject to income tax on the income received through such transparent foreign entity and the payment made by the taxpayer is carried out at market value; or

  • The payment is considered to be non-existent for tax purposes in the jurisdiction in which the foreign entity is located; or

  • The foreign recipient does not consider the payment to qualify as a taxable income in accordance with its applicable tax provisions.

For purposes of the above, control shall mean when one party has effective power over another entity or in the management of such other company, to an extent allowing it to decide when income, profits or dividends are distributed, either directly or through a third person.

Another example is a newly included provision established by the Mexican tax authorities focused on limiting the deduction of payments made by the taxpayer, when they are also deductible for a related party resident in Mexico or abroad, unless the related party deducting the payment made by the taxpayer includes it as part of its own taxable income in either the same fiscal year or in the following one.

As can be seen, multinationals with investments in Mexico should consider and model the tax impact that the above provisions, along with other new or amended rules part of the 2014 tax reform in Mexico, can have on their local businesses and on the overall tax burden of the group.

David Cuéllar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Claudia Solano (claudia.solano@mx.pwc.com), Mexico City

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article