Australian election triggers update on international tax policies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian election triggers update on international tax policies

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
amber-weir-ul0hbkwlrf4-unsplash.jpg

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper Australia discusses the four key initiatives to tackle multinational tax avoidance announced by the Labor opposition ahead of Australia’s general election.

Ahead of the Australian General Election on May 21 2022, the Labor opposition has announced a four-pronged international tax policy which is described as ‘a responsible and measured multinational tax integrity package’.

In a joint media release by the Shadow Treasurer, the Honourable Jim Chalmers MP and the Shadow Assistant Treasurer and Shadow Assistant Minister for Treasury, Labor has highlighted its four key initiatives to tackle multinational tax avoidance as follows:

1. Fully supporting the OECD’s two pillar solution including a 15% minimum tax on global profits. Labor recognises the need to address the digitalisation of our economies and with a greater emphasis on taxing related profits where the products or services are sold.

2. Limiting debt – related deductions of multinationals at 30% of profits, while preserving the arm’s-length test and the worldwide gearing ratio.  While there is limited detail provided in the media release, the interaction with Australia’s thin capitalisation rules requires further clarification particularly as to the practical application of the arm’s-length debt amount test and the safe harbour test.  The reforms are intended to apply from July 1 2023.

3. Limiting the ability to access concessional treaty withholding taxes on payments made to recognised tax havens (for example Cayman Islands, Bermuda) for the use of intellectual property held in those tax havens.  Deductions for these payments will be denied unless taxpayers can substantiate that the royalty payments are not for the dominant purpose of tax avoidance. While Labor will consult on these proposed rules, it is anticipated that these rules will be applicable from July 1 2023.

4. Further initiatives enhancing transparency on international tax structures including a public registry of ultimate beneficial ownership, mandatory reporting of tax haven exposure to shareholders and related initiatives in relation to being eligible to participate in government tenders will be introduced by Labor.

Labor is forecasting additional revenues from these international tax measures to raise approximately AU$1.89 billion over the next four years which will assist in repairing the budget, preventing profit shifting and evening the playing field for Australian businesses.  If enacted, this combination of measures will materially increase the ATO’s armoury to address multinational tax avoidance.

Uber Technologies Inc case and legal professional privilege: In-house counsel

Although not a tax specific case and following on from our previous article, in-house lawyers are reminded of the heavier onus of proof to confirm that its internal communications are privileged, as opposed to proving privilege in communications involving external counsel.

While noting that in-house counsel need to have the appropriate degree of independence, the role and structure of the particular in-house legal team will have a guiding impact on whether privilege should apply to their advice – noting amongst other things that in-house lawyers may have a broader strategic or commercial role in particular companies.

Australia–India economic co-operation trade agreement

As part of the broad Australia-India economic co-operation trade agreement, Australia has agreed in principle to amend its domestic taxation law to remove the taxation of offshore income of Indian businesses providing essentially technical services to Australian businesses.  

The practical application of the Australia–India double tax treaty pursuant to the royalties article (Article 12) has been a major concern for Indian services providers particularly since the Satyam Computer Services Limited v. FCT (2018) 108 ATR 822 Case, and it appears in principle that Australia has agreed to a unilateral solution.

The Australian and Indian governments exchanged letters dealing with these proposed amendments to Australian domestic law in April 2022 and we expect this reform to be implemented in the coming months.

 

Jock McCormack

Partner, DLA Piper Australia

E: jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com


more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New reforms represent the most seismic shift in Canadian TP legislation since its enactment and a clear inflection point for MNEs, ITR has heard
Spain did not transpose EU VAT rules for SMEs or works of art; in other news, an increased VAT threshold came into force in South Africa
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
Gift this article