Recovery of corporate investment in Portugal

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Recovery of corporate investment in Portugal

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
CFEI II applies to business investments until June 30 2021

Paulo Núncio and João Miguel Fernandes of Morais Leitão consider whether Portugal’s extraordinary tax credit will boost corporate investment in Portugal.

The whole world plummeted into an unexpected pandemic crisis in 2020. For the purpose of relaunching Portugal’s economy and mitigating the negative effects of COVID-19, EU member states are putting in place the final approval procedures for a recovery plan which is expected to amount to a total investment of approximately €1.8 trillion (approximately $2.1 trillion) to help rebuild Europe in a post-COVID-19 environment.

In its turn, the Portuguese government has approved a supplementary state budget for 2020 aimed at not only adapting the state budget under implementation in relation to COVID-19 but also to approve further tax measures. 

As a result, the Extraordinary Tax Credit for Investment II (CFEI II), a temporary tax incentive, was approved and applies to business investments until June 30 2021. 

CFEI II

The purpose of CFEI II is to mitigate the shelving of envisaged investments and incentivise companies to invest. The super-credit tax regime (CFEI I) was successfully implemented in 2013 and contributed positively to the economic recovery of Portugal in the following years. 

This tax incentive consists of a corporate income tax (CIT) credit for 20% of the investment made in assets allocated to the company’s activity, up to 70% of CIT collection, provided that the overall amount of eligible expenses does not exceed €5 million. This credit may be deductible against the CIT collection for an additional period of five years in certain circumstances.

As a rule, any companies liable to CIT that develop a commercial, industrial, or agricultural activity are eligible to benefit from this tax incentive. 

For the purposes of this regime, eligible investments are the ones made on fixed tangible assets and biological assets other than consumables, newly acquired and put into use until the end of 2021. Also, eligible investments are the ones made on some intangible assets subject to depreciation (namely patents, trademarks, licenses, or other assimilated rights).

Eligible investments must be held for a minimum period of five years. In addition, the transfer of any eligible investments under the scope of a restructuring transaction benefiting from tax neutrality must be approved by the Minister of Finance. 

Deductions shall be grounded in documents that must include in detail the relevant investment, amount, and other relevant data. In a scenario of non-compliance with the rules on the eligibility of the investments, the taxpayer must refund the missing amount of tax, accrued with compensatory interest increased by 15%.

This regime has a broad nature that should contribute to its successful implementation among potential investors, stimulating the recovery of corporate investment in Portugal. 

However, as result of the 2021 state budget, since January 1 2021 large companies can only benefit from CFEI II if the average number of employees remains the same before and during the application of this incentive. 

This restriction raises several legal issues and may have a negative impact on the successful application of this tax incentive, considering that it changes the eligibility rules for CFEI II during its application period and represents a red flag to tax certainty for potential investors. 

There are strong arguments to sustain that this limitation should not apply to large companies that were eligible for the CFEI II in 2020 even in a scenario where the relevant investments are only made in 2021. 

In addition, the application of this restriction to large companies can be challenged on the grounds of a potential violation of the Portuguese constitution, namely the breach of the constitutional principles of proportionality and equality.

Finally, considering that a consistent economy recovery must be based on a substantial business investment increase, it would be advisable to extend this tax incentive from June 30 until, at least, the end of the current financial year, in order to cover all corporate investments made in Portugal in 2021.  

 

Paulo Núncio

Partner, Morais Leitão

E: plnuncio@mlgts.pt

 

João Miguel Fernandes

Associate, Morais Leitão

E: jmfernandes@mlgts.pt


more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
Gift this article