How tax liability insurance is helping to de-risk the real estate industry

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How tax liability insurance is helping to de-risk the real estate industry

Sponsored by

BMS Group
The European tax insurance space continues to grow in complexity

In this interview, head of tax at Acquinex, Paul Barnes, talks to Dean Andrews, division director and head of tax liability insurance in London at BMS Group, about the tax risks that real estate companies and funds are seeking tax insurance on.

Acquinex provides specialist insurance products for deals across Europe.



Here, Paul Barnes considers the most important real estate risks which are being insured across European markets.



Dean: What proportion of your time is taken up by quoting and underwriting real estate related tax risks?



Paul: Insurance for real estate clients is consistently taking up about a third of our time, with insurance being underwritten for risks in a wide number of European countries.



Dean: Which country do you insure the most tax risks relating to real estate from?



Paul: Germany.



The most common risk we are asked to insure concerns the application of real estate transfer tax (RETT) to a current transaction. A rewrite of the German Real Estate Transfer Tax Act has been on the cards for over a year, and because there is always a time distance between signing and completion, clients are seeking protection that their contemplated transaction will not be affected by the new RETT law, if it is announced between signing and completion.



We have been issuing policies for such RETT risks in 2019, all through 2020, and we anticipate more in 2021.



Dean: Are there any other German real estate risks that you have been insuring?



Paul: The application of what is known as the ‘extended trade tax exemption’ has been common which exempts rental income from German trade tax. There are various considerations which arise on this such as the position when leasing out fixtures, or providing services such as security, maintenance, or asset management. The trade tax exemption is important, because it is not just the rental income that can be subject to German trade tax, but the capital gain, in the event of an asset sale.



Also, we are increasingly being asked to insure permanent establishment risks of non-German entities that hold German real estate, because the German tax authorities are increasingly looking at whether German companies performing ancillary services for the Propco are agents of the non-German Propco and thereby cause a permanent establishment of the Propco under the local implementation of BEPS Action 7.



Dean: What other European countries do you see the most real estate tax risks emanating from?



Paul: Poland is probably next on the list. We see a substantial number of enquiries which relate to whether the sale of real estate is treated as a sale of a going concern, or of a single asset for VAT purposes, referred to as the civil law activity tax (CLAT). This is especially relevant whereby a number of plots of land are needed to be purchased for a particular construction project.



In France, we are often asked to insure whether an SIIC or SCPI, which are French real estate investment trusts (REITs), and OPCIs, which are alternative French real estate investment funds, qualify as such, because not only does this affect corporate income tax on the French entity, but also affects the amount of French withholding tax on distributions made. We have also insured the VAT treatment on incentives offered by landlords to prospective tenants, and insured liabilities in relation to what is known as ‘office creation tax’ is payable, and the 3% French property tax which can be levied on companies which own French real estate is due.



In Spain, there is a curious piece of anti-avoidance legislation, contained not in the tax code, but in the Spanish Securities Markets Law, and which can impose Spanish transfer tax on the sale of shares of a Spanish company holding real estate.



Dean: What about UK tax risks?



Paul: There is a large number of UK real estate risks in terms of subject matter that we insure. From trading vs investment risks, transactions in land, substantial shareholding exemption qualification to insuring a minimum capital gains base cost.



We have also insured capital allowances streaming risks, and, similar to Poland, whether the transfer of a property is a transfer of a going concern for VAT purposes.



Probably the largest UK tax risk we insure, in terms of frequency, are stamp duty land tax (SDLT) risks and whether the very wide-ranging Section 75A anti-avoidance provision applies, even on what could be a fairly simple transaction such as a hive up. Other SDLT risks that we are often asked to insure are whether the property is residential or mixed use for SDLT purposes, and whether the sale of an empty building is subject to SDLT.





Dean Andrews

T: +44 0 20 7480 0308

E: dean.andrews@bmsgroup.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Gift this article