OECD announces changes to CBCR guidelines

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

OECD announces changes to CBCR guidelines

At a recent conference in Paris, the OECD’s Joe Andrus, director of transfer pricing, discussed the results of Working Party 6 deliberations and announced the alterations that will be made to country-by-country reporting (CbCR) guidelines as a result of feedback from the tax industry.

The OECD issued a revised draft of chapter V of the OECD guidelines on documentation in January. Guidance on country-by-country reporting (CBCR) was one of the vital additions aimed at helping tax authorities with risk assessment. However, reactions from the tax industry showed that, CBCR in its current state, was not considered feasible.

The main criticisms included:

· extra time and cost;

· omission of materiality thresholds;

· no differentiation in thresholds for MNE’s and SME’s; and

· failure to simplify process for taxpayer, only the tax authority.

The criticisms were numerous and widespread. Feedback, which the OECD requested on January 30 2014, reflected an overarching consensus that the guidelines were impractical. It appears that the tax market’s response heavily influenced the recent alterations.

The results of WP6 deliberations are as follows:

• concluded CBCR only requires aggregate countrywide reporting, not entity by entity;

• required financial data: revenue, earnings before taxes, cash tax, current tax accrual, FTEs and tangible assets;

• CBCR will not be part of the master file;

• last six columns have been omitted (Interest, royalties, etcetra);

• transactional reporting only in local file;

• 2nd page of CBCR: number of entities and business codes;

• build from either stats or financial reporting so long as applied consistently across the group;

• make clear in plain language that this is high level reporting; and

• 25 highest paid employees removed from the master file.

The changes reflect the OECD’s desire to cooperate with taxpayers and tax authorities to reach a CBCR template which is feasible and suits the needs of the tax industry.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article