Shome on appropriateness of retrospective approach to tax policy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Shome on appropriateness of retrospective approach to tax policy

Parthasarathi Shome, minister of state to the Indian finance minister, has said there are instances where retrospective approaches, by tax authorities, are inappropriate. He was speaking at an international tax conference at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise last week.

shome150.jpg

The minister was asked by Barbara Angus, of Ernst & Young in Washington, whether he thought there are instances when retrospective approaches are appropriate.

Shome replied that in instances where new evidence comes to light, a retrospective approach would be a useful tool, especially going back up to 10 years and in particular with regard to exchange of information.

Shome chaired an expert committee in 2012 which determined that retrospective application of Indian tax law should only take place in exceptional or the ‘rarest of rare’ cases. This followed the government’s insertion of retrospective amendments in last year’s Finance Bill.

The minister also said in Sweden that retrospective approaches may be able to help in some cases that cannot be solved simply with rules and ordinance.

However, he added that authorities should not try to apply retrospection in rulings by the Supreme Court and other precedents set by the judiciary if it would create a fundamental change.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
The US multinational paid 20% more tax in 2025 than 2024, it said; in other news, more than 25,000 HMRC staff have been upskilled on AI
Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
Gift this article