Shome on appropriateness of retrospective approach to tax policy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Shome on appropriateness of retrospective approach to tax policy

Parthasarathi Shome, minister of state to the Indian finance minister, has said there are instances where retrospective approaches, by tax authorities, are inappropriate. He was speaking at an international tax conference at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise last week.

shome150.jpg

The minister was asked by Barbara Angus, of Ernst & Young in Washington, whether he thought there are instances when retrospective approaches are appropriate.

Shome replied that in instances where new evidence comes to light, a retrospective approach would be a useful tool, especially going back up to 10 years and in particular with regard to exchange of information.

Shome chaired an expert committee in 2012 which determined that retrospective application of Indian tax law should only take place in exceptional or the ‘rarest of rare’ cases. This followed the government’s insertion of retrospective amendments in last year’s Finance Bill.

The minister also said in Sweden that retrospective approaches may be able to help in some cases that cannot be solved simply with rules and ordinance.

However, he added that authorities should not try to apply retrospection in rulings by the Supreme Court and other precedents set by the judiciary if it would create a fundamental change.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Partner payouts could also be reduced by a fifth, it has been reported
There is no logical reason not to extend an exemption from EU CFC rules to multinationals headquartered in side-by-side jurisdictions, USCIB said
Gift this article