Voting closes for TPWeek’s Leading Forces in Transfer Pricing today

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Voting closes for TPWeek’s Leading Forces in Transfer Pricing today

The TPWeek readers’ poll on the leading forces in global transfer pricing closes today. Votes posted after 5pm BST on March 27 will not be counted.

tpweek1-150.jpg

Transfer pricing professionals and observers have been voting for the organisations, transfer pricing cases or individuals they think are the leading forces in global transfer pricing, with influence over the direction policy will take.

To make your opinion count vote here.

The winners will be announced on Thursday 29 March. Thanks to the hundreds of professionals that have voted so far.

The nominees are:

ActionAid

For its report on drinks company, SAB Miller - Calling Time: Why SABMiller should stop dodging taxes in Africa. The report has led to investigations by South Africa, Ghana, Tanzania, Zambia and Mauritius and may lead to future audits. Since the report, Ghana has implemented its own transfer pricing regime.

African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF)

For its commitment to helping African nations implement efficient transfer pricing regimes. The forum holds events and seminars aimed at building relations and communication between African nations; with developed countries; and organisations such as the UN and the OECD.

EU Joint Transfer Pricing Forum (JTPF)

For its work on low-value-adding intra-group services and the report on potential approaches to non-EU triangular cases.

GlaxoSmithKline (Canada)

For its ground-breaking case which will be decided by the Supreme Court of Canada later this year. The case will decide on whether the ALP or reasonable business purpose prevails under Canadian transfer pricing rules.

HM Revenue & Customs

For its survey into the practicality of global transfer pricing guidelines, which aims to offer day-to-day practical guidance for taxpayers and administrations and enhance the global understanding of transfer pricing.

Pranab Mukherjee (Indian Minister of Finance)

For his decision to enact an advance pricing agreement (APA) programme in India. The programme should allow the vast number of multinational taxpayers investing in and out of India to secure some level of certainty in a country renowned for its transfer pricing disputes and high number of audits.

US President Barack Obama and Senator David Camp

For their competing proposals on US tax reform, which include approaches to offshore transfers of intangible assets and taxing excess returns from transfers of intangibles to low-taxed affiliates.

PwC

For its transfer pricing report on developing countries. The study, commissioned by the European Commission, aims to present recommendations on suitable approaches for supporting developing countries in the adoption and implementation of transfer pricing rules in order to enhance domestic resource mobilisation, in-line with the principles of good governance in the tax area.

Sam Maruca, the IRS's transfer pricing director

For his efforts in combining the advance pricing agreement (APA) and Competent Authority programmes in the US.

SNF (Australia)

For the taxpayer's ability to influence a change in law by the Australian Tax Office (ATO). In a Full Federal Court decision the taxpayer secured a victory in a case concerning comparables and the application of methods. In response the ATO released a consultation paper aimed at bringing its transfer pricing regulations more in-line with international best practice.

Taskforce on Financial Integrity and Economic Development

For its work to curtail the mispricing in trade imports and exports and its promotion of: country-by-country accounting of sales, profits, and taxes paid by multinational corporations; beneficial ownership in all banking and securities accounts; automatic cross-border exchange of tax information; and harmonisation of predicate offences under anti-money laundering laws.

The OECD

For its Working Party No 6 project on the transfer pricing aspects of intangibles, which aims to provide clearer guidelines on the definition of intangible assets.

The UN

For its development of a manual to apply the OECD's Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations to developing countries. The manual aims to simplify the guidelines and make them easier to apply to developing tax administrations.

Zimmer (France)

For its role in a French case about the treatment of permanent establishment.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
Gift this article