Mining for insights from transfer pricing leaders

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mining for insights from transfer pricing leaders

Taxpayers should not pass the opportunity to get answers from influential transfer pricing officials in September.

The importance of transfer pricing as a reputational issue means it is critical that taxpayers have the right policies to enable them to comply with their obligations on the topic around the world.

Businesses need to understand national rules on related-party transactions, develop the best ways - including having the right technology - to adhere to them and maintain an awareness of how the rules might be changed or added to in the future.

Their knowledge and understanding of national transfer pricing laws and rulings in a given jurisdiction allows tax departments to make the right decisions on subjects, such as the financing of a subsidiary, the location of an R&D project, the suitability of an advance pricing agreement, the correct methodology when documenting a transaction or the approach to take when faced with an audit, as well as monitor tax risk.

Australia, Canada and the UK are three jurisdictions that have proposed amendments or gone ahead with rewrites to their transfer pricing regimes in the last few months. Advance pricing agreements are now possible in Hong Kong and India - though no guidance has been published in that country yet. And concepts such as management fees and location savings are getting wider exposure around the world.

These are important developments that require careful thought and analysis, particularly at a time when transfer pricing rules and regulations are developing rapidly all over the world, judges are getting the opportunity to interpret existing laws, sometimes in unforeseen ways, and tax administration is becoming more and more international, with ideas and tips being passed back and forth by revenue authorities all the time.

The Ask the Authorities panel at September’s Global Transfer Pricing Forum, hosted by International Tax Review and TPWeek, offers executives a unique platform to get answers to their questions about related-party matters.

Officials from three countries will field queries about all aspects of transfer pricing during the 75-minute discussion at 1.30pm on September 25. The agenda covers documentation, legal certainty, advance pricing agreements, joint audits and alternative dispute resolution, though the participation of Michelle Levac, of the Canada Revenue Agency, who chairs the OECD’s Working Party No 6, makes it likely that the multilateral organisation’s most recent projects on intangibles and restructuring will also come up.

The other panellists are Eric Lesprit, the head of the APA team at the French Tax Administration and Peter Steeds, who took over as head of transfer pricing at HM Revenue & Customs in the UK last October.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article