Korea introduces a customs advanced pricing agreement (APA) regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Korea introduces a customs advanced pricing agreement (APA) regime

as.jpg

TP Week correspondent DJ Yeo of Kim & Chang reports on the introduction of a new customs APA scheme

south-korean-flag.jpg

The Korean Customs Service (KCS) introduced the Advance Customs Valuation Arrangement (ACVA) on January 1. This is an APA regime for customs purposes under which the KCS can approve an importer’s transfer pricing method to determine the transaction value of goods purchased from its foreign related parties. The relevant KCS notice provides the details regarding the procedures and legal ramifications of an ACVA.

An ACVA applicant should file an application with the KCS that should include information and documents relating to the subject transfer pricing such as a supply agreement between the transactional parties, documents/analysis underlying the inter-company pricing, similar to an APA application for income tax purposes.

The KCS should complete its review of the ACVA application within one year from the filing date (this can be compared with a two-year processing period for a unilateral APA on the income tax side). During this review period, the applicant may file a provisional value of the goods at the time of import declaration and can thus avoid a penalty even if the finally approved terms of the ACVA differ from the terms proposed in the application.

Once approved, the ACVA will be effective for a period of three years during which the taxpayer will be protected from a customs audit. The taxpayer should, however, file an annual report indicating whether all approved terms of the ACVA and the critical assumptions underlying the AVCA are met. After the three-year period, the taxpayer may file a renewal application, which is expected to be simpler than the initial ACVA application/process.

ak.jpg

The ACVA was introduced to reduce disputes with taxpayers and provide them with certainty on customs duties. However, it remains to be seen how an approved ACVA obtained by an importer would be considered by the income tax authorities when they review the inter-company pricing for income tax purposes.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

From Instagram content to £100m transactions, the founder of Thomas & Co International discusses building a modern tax and accounting firm for business founders
Growing GAAR scrutiny is driving taxpayers to look beyond legal form and demonstrate the commercial rationale underpinning tax-efficient structures
Pillar two has been clients’ ‘biggest headache’ but also a driver of growth for MHA, which believes it has the edge over its big four rivals
Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
Gift this article