Korea introduces a customs advanced pricing agreement (APA) regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Korea introduces a customs advanced pricing agreement (APA) regime

as.jpg

TP Week correspondent DJ Yeo of Kim & Chang reports on the introduction of a new customs APA scheme

south-korean-flag.jpg

The Korean Customs Service (KCS) introduced the Advance Customs Valuation Arrangement (ACVA) on January 1. This is an APA regime for customs purposes under which the KCS can approve an importer’s transfer pricing method to determine the transaction value of goods purchased from its foreign related parties. The relevant KCS notice provides the details regarding the procedures and legal ramifications of an ACVA.

An ACVA applicant should file an application with the KCS that should include information and documents relating to the subject transfer pricing such as a supply agreement between the transactional parties, documents/analysis underlying the inter-company pricing, similar to an APA application for income tax purposes.

The KCS should complete its review of the ACVA application within one year from the filing date (this can be compared with a two-year processing period for a unilateral APA on the income tax side). During this review period, the applicant may file a provisional value of the goods at the time of import declaration and can thus avoid a penalty even if the finally approved terms of the ACVA differ from the terms proposed in the application.

Once approved, the ACVA will be effective for a period of three years during which the taxpayer will be protected from a customs audit. The taxpayer should, however, file an annual report indicating whether all approved terms of the ACVA and the critical assumptions underlying the AVCA are met. After the three-year period, the taxpayer may file a renewal application, which is expected to be simpler than the initial ACVA application/process.

ak.jpg

The ACVA was introduced to reduce disputes with taxpayers and provide them with certainty on customs duties. However, it remains to be seen how an approved ACVA obtained by an importer would be considered by the income tax authorities when they review the inter-company pricing for income tax purposes.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

From Dhruva Advisors to Svalner Atlas, Ryan is growing fast. Tom Shave discusses consolidation, competition, and tax’s private equity debate
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal the shortlisted nominees for the Middle East Tax Awards
The UK has confirmed its approach to the OECD’s side-by-side deal, but US-parented groups may find pillar two compliance remains far from straightforward
Fragmented pillar two taxation and increased use of AI by tax authorities have left clients fearful of heightened disputes exposure
Grant Thornton Advisors’ latest acquisition has produced the fifth-largest US advisory firm by revenue, but there’s still a clear gulf between it and the big four
Crowe joins Grant Thornton, WTS and Ryan in attracting PE investment, suggesting that dealmakers remain bullish on the tax advisory sector
HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
Gift this article