Canada’s 2019 federal budget introduces transfer pricing measures

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada’s 2019 federal budget introduces transfer pricing measures

Ottawa - Large

Deloitte’s Phil Fortier and Tony Anderson summarise the transfer pricing (TP) measures in Canada’s 2019 federal budget.

Canada’s 2019 federal budget, released March 19, proposes two new measures concerning the relationship between the transfer pricing (TP) rules in the Income Tax Act (ITA) and other provisions of the ITA. The budget also provides commentary on the ongoing BEPS project.

A summary of the TP-related measures contained in the budget is provided below.

Transfer pricing measures

The two budget measures related to TP include the order of application of the TP rules and the definition of transaction for an extended reassessment period.

Order of application of the transfer pricing rules

Canada’s government proposes amending the ITA to clarify that the TP rules in Part XVI.1 (s. 247) should have priority of application over other provisions in the ITA. The budget notes that this change may have various implications and provides an example on the calculation of TP penalties imposed under Part XVI.1 of the ITA. 

The budget notes that the current exceptions to the application of TP rules that pertain to Canadian resident corporations that have amounts owing from controlled foreign affiliates, or guarantees of amounts owed by controlled foreign affiliates, will continue to apply.

The order of application measure will apply to taxation periods that begin on or after March 19 2019.

Definition of transaction for extended reassessment period

Canada’s government has also proposed amending the ITA to ensure that the term “transaction” has the same meaning in both the TP rules and the applicable reassessment rules.

As background, an extended three-year reassessment period applies to reassessments made as a consequence of a transaction involving a taxpayer and a non-resident with whom the taxpayer does not deal at arm’s-length.

The budget notes that this reassessment extension is intended to apply in the TP context, but that the expanded definition of “transaction” used in the TP rules does not apply for purposes of the extended reassessment period. As such, the change in definition of transaction for reassessment purposes is intended to better align the TP rules and the extended three-year reassessment period.

The change to the definition of “transaction” for purposes of the extended reassessment period will apply to taxation periods of taxpayers for which the normal reassessment period ends on or after March 19 2019.

Update on the BEPS project

The budget reiterates that the Canadian government continues to cooperate and actively participate in the OECD project known as the BEPS initiative.

Multilateral instrument

The budget notes that the Canadian government is taking the necessary steps to enact the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI) into Canadian law, and to ratify the MLI as needed to bring the tool into force.

Country-by-country reporting

In addition, the budget notes that Canada is currently participating in an OECD review of the information being collected in the country-by-country reports to ensure that they provide tax administrations with information that facilitates accurate assessment for TP and other BEPS risks. This review is scheduled to be completed in 2020

Phil Fortier - Portrait

Phil Fortier

 

anderson.jpg

Tony Anderson





This article was written by Phil Fortier and Tony Anderson of Deloitte LLP in Canada. 

Phil Fortier, Partner
Deloitte LLP
Email: philfortier@deloitte.ca

Tony Anderson, Partner
Deloitte LLP
Email: toanderson@deloitte.ca



© 2019. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.

This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte network”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this communication.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two has been clients’ ‘biggest headache’ but also a driver of growth for MHA, which believes it has the edge over its big four rivals
Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Gift this article