China plans to increase foreign corporate income tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China plans to increase foreign corporate income tax

Liao Luming, the director of the Chinese finance ministry’s general office has outlined a new unified corporate tax law, which aims to treat domestic and foreign corporations on equal footing, effectively raising corporate income tax for foreign-invested enterprises

Liao Luming, the director of the Chinese finance ministry's general office has outlined a new unified corporate tax law, which aims to treat domestic and foreign corporations on equal footing, effectively raising corporate income tax for foreign-invested enterprises.

The government plans a unified tax rate of between 24% and 28%. Foreign-invested companies are now subject to a 20% corporate income tax rate, while the domestic rate is 33%. These attractive rates have helped make China the second largest recipient of foreign investment in the world.

"There has been pressure from Chinese companies that say the system up until now has been unfair," said Suzie Chen, a tax manager at HSBC in Shanghai. "It is hard for them to compete with foreign companies now. These changes will affect China's attractiveness to foreign companies, but it will not be a big problem because investors consider other advantages and costs, not just tax issues."

A finance director at a leading multinational agreed: "The increase in corporate tax will have some negative impact. But most multinationals that have invested heavily in China did so because of the competitive labour and infrastructure costs."

China has several special economic zones in which companies benefit from tax incentives designed to attract foreign investors and companies into the country. The government is considering amending this system in favour of tax incentives for specific industrial sectors.

The new law could be implemented as early as January 1 2006 to meet pledges China made when it joined the World Trade Organisation in 2001.

ITR Week welcomes your feedback on this or any other story. Please email the author with your comments. Letters may be published online.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights “significant concerns”
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
The US president’s threats expose how one superpower can subjugate other countries using tariffs as an economic weapon
The US president has softened his stance on tariffs over Greenland; in other news, a partner from Osborne Clarke has won a High Court appeal against the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Emmanuel Manda tells ITR about early morning boxing, working on Zambia’s only refinery, and what makes tax cool
Hany Elnaggar examines how AI is reshaping tax administration across the Gulf Cooperation Council, transforming the taxpayer experience from periodic reporting to continuous compliance
The APA resolution signals opportunities for multinationals and will pacify investor concerns, local experts told ITR
Gift this article