Mexico: New Mexican mining tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New Mexican mining tax

cuellar.jpg

esquivel.jpg

David Cuellar


Salvador Esquivel

Several proposals to implement a new mining royalty have been considered by the Mexican Congress. In December 2012 the three main political parties in Mexico (PRI, PAN and PRD) executed a collaboration agreement called Pact for Mexico which intends to reconcile the proposals of the parties and reach the agreements that the country needs for its development. On March 2013, PRI, the governing party in Mexico, submitted a proposal to the Mexican Congress to introduce a Mexican mining tax. The proposal has been approved by the House of Representatives and has been passed to the Senate for review and approval.

The Senate postponed the approval of this reform until the Second Sessions' Period of September to December 2013, unless there is a call for an Extraordinary Sessions' Period during the summer.

The initiative, as approved by the House of Representatives, aims to establish the payment of a mining tax on exploration and extraction of minerals for the benefit of the states and municipalities where mining takes place.

This new mining tax will likely impact many multinational mining companies with Mexican projects. Below is a summary of the most relevant provisions of the Bill as currently drafted by the House of Representatives.

The tax is determined on an annual basis by applying a 5% rate to the taxable income as determined under Mexican Income Tax Law rules, with certain income – such as interest and taxable annual inflationary adjustment – and deduction – such as interest and depreciation – exceptions.

The tax should be paid by the end of March of the following year. Non-compliance or reporting false information should give rise to cancellation of the concession. No tax loss carry forwards are allowed.

As the tax should be deductible for income tax purposes, the effective tax rate would be 3.6% instead of 5%.

In the case of idle properties, holders of the relevant mining concession will be required to pay an additional 50% of the mining fee they currently pay under the Federal Rights Law for their mining concession, where no exploration or exploitation work is performed on such properties for two consecutive years within the first 11 years following the issuance date of the corresponding concession title.

While for properties where the issuance date of the relevant concession title is 12 years or older, and where no exploration or exploitation work is carried out for two consecutive years, the concession holder would be required to pay an additional 100% of the mining fee they pay under the Federal Rights Law for their mining concession.

Also proposed is the creation of a State Committee for the Regional Development of Mining Areas, comprised by representatives from the federal, state and municipal governments from the relevant communities involved and from the most relevant mining companies operating therein. They will be responsible for managing the funds and shall determine the works for sustainable community development.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Salvador Esquivel (salvador.esquivel@mx.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Rafael Tena tells ITR about the ‘crazy’ Mexican market, ditching the hourly rate, and refusing to grow his fledgling firm in an ‘unstructured way’
It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Gift this article