Laos: Stock market tax incentives

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Laos: Stock market tax incentives

harrison.jpg

Daniel Harrison

In what is undoubtedly an effort to promote the growth of Laos' first and only capital market, the regulators have introduced key tax incentives related to investment associated with the Lao Securities Exchange (LSX). While there are only two companies listed on the stock exchange, there is an expectation that a handful of other entities will list in the near future. The two companies listed are EDL-Generation Public Company (EDL-Gen), a subsidiary of the state-owned energy company, Electricite du Laos (EDL), and Banque Pour Le Commerce Exterieur Lao Public (BCEL), the largest bank in Laos.

As touched on in a previous article (December/January 2013), from January 1 2013 – transitional measures aside – Laos instated a general profit tax rate of 24% for domestic and foreign entities alike; a reduction from 28% previously, and 35% before that.

Additionally, in an effort to fast-track listings on the recently established LSX, companies floating on the exchange will enjoy a profit tax rate reduction of five percentage points (a tax rate of 19%) for a period of four years from the date of registration on the LSX, under article 29 of the Amended Tax Law (No. 05/NA, dated December 20 2011).

Further to the profit tax rate reduction of companies listing on the exchange, under article 46 of the Amended Tax Law, dividend distributions and profit derived from share sales of companies listed on the LSX are non-taxable income. Ordinarily, dividend distributions and profit on the sale of shares are both subject to income tax at the rate of 10%, for both domestic and foreign investors – with the tax collected via withholding.

These incentives sound great on paper, but what do they mean in real financial terms for investors? Below are two very simple comparisons between an investment in a listed and non-listed company, ceteris paribus.

Comparison A

Assuming an initial investment of $1,000, with a modest return on equity (ROE) of 15%, a dividend payout ratio of 100% and modest capital growth of 10%, the financial benefits of the tax incentives can be illustrated as shown in Table 1.

Table 1


Non-listed

Listed

Investment

$

1,000

$

1,000


Net (operating) profit before tax

$

150

$

150

Profit tax rate


24%


19%

Net (operating) profit after tax

$

114

$

122


Dividend paid

$

114

$

122

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Net dividend after tax

$

103

$

122


Proceeds from sale of investment

$

1,100

$

1 ,100

Less: Initial investment

$

-1,000

$

-1,000

Profit on sale of investment

$

100

$

100

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Profit on sale of investment after tax

$

90

$

100


Total net income from investment





Dividend

$

103

$

122

Capital growth

$

90

$

100


$

193

$

222


Total after-tax return on initial invesment


19.26%


22.15%


Additional after-tax return on initial investment




2.89%

Comparison B

For the same initial investment of $1,000, if the ROE is increased to 20%, the dividend payout ratio remains at 100% and capital growth is increased to 15%, the financial benefits of the tax incentives are compounded. See Table 2.

Table 2


Non-listed

Listed

Investment

$

1,000

$

1,000


Net (operating) profit before tax

$

200

$

200

Profit tax rate


24%


19%

Net (operating) profit after tax

$

152

$

162


Dividend paid

$

152

$

162

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Net dividend after tax

$

137

$

162


Proceeds from sale of investment

$

1,150

$

1,150

Less: Initial investment

$

-1,000

$

-1,000

Profit on sale of investment

$

150

$

150

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Profit on sale of investment after tax

$

135

$

150


Total net income from investment





Dividend

$

137

$

162

Capital growth

$

135

$

150


$

272

$

312


Total after-tax return on initial invesment


27.18%


31.20%


Additional after-tax return on initial investment




4.02%

While equities trading is still a relatively new concept in Laos, these favourable tax breaks coupled with the efforts of the LSX and its registered brokers to educate potential investors, along with companies' growing demand for greater access to capital raising avenues, should ensure the rapid transformation of equities investment in Laos.

Daniel Harrison (daniel.harrison@vdb-loi.com)

VDB Loi

Tel: +85 62 145 4679

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Case workers are ‘still not great’ but are making fewer enquiries, making the right decision more often and are more open to calls, ITR has heard
There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Gift this article