Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Editorial

Speaking to taxpayers in Latin America, it is clear that discontent is one emotion that dominates their feeling towards a region that is not afraid to diverge from standard practices, and where distrust between taxpayers and tax authorities often abounds.

Brazil has long been an example of a country where international taxation norms do not apply. This continues to be the case, with transfer pricing rules and R&D provisions, among others, governed by unique sets of principles not seen elsewhere.

This, of course, means that innovative solutions are required to successfully navigate the tax landscape. And Brazil is by no means alone in this regard.

Brazil is also not alone in seeing rising rates of investment. According to UN statistics, foreign direct investment to South America increased by 12% in the past year.

But while this clearly shows that many countries in the region have successfully attracted increased levels of investment and trade, which has in turn positively impacted economic growth, this is often achieved in spite of the tax system rather than because of it.

Jeffrey Owens, former OECD tax chief, acknowledged this recently when he said that while tax is never the main driver of an investment decision, it can sometimes be a barrier. He referenced Brazil (along with India) as an example of where this can be seen.

However, with Brazil set to host the two biggest global events on the sporting calendar – the FIFA World Cup in 2014 and the Summer Olympics in 2016 – it would not be surprising if tax policy is used to attract the necessary levels of investment to ensure the success of these showpiece events. The Minister of Finance has already said increasing investment rates, particularly in infrastructure, is a government priority. We know the Brazilian authorities are not shy when it comes to changing tax laws and provisions (in the past 24 years there have been around 4 million new tax rules), but perhaps they would be better served in focusing on consistent policies and providing certainty for taxpayers.

It is against this backdrop that International Tax Review publishes the 10th edition of its Latin America Guide in association with leading tax advisers: Deloitte, EY and Munoz, Manzo y Ocampo.

The supplement also contains exclusive interviews with a number of taxpayers, in which they outline the tax challenges faced by companies operating in Brazil, including insights regarding what the biggest taxpayer concerns are at present, what their relationships with the tax authorities are like, and why they want a greater focus on simplicity and certainty.

Matthew Gilleard

Corporate Tax editor

International Tax Review

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 6 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Michel Braun of WTS Digital reviews ITR’s inaugural AI in tax event, and concludes that AI will enhance, not replace, the tax professional
The report is solid and balanced as it correctly underscores the ambitious institutional redesign that Brazil has undertaken in adopting a dual VAT model, experts tell ITR
The Brazilian law firm partner warns against going independent too early, considers the weight of political pressure, and tells ITR what makes tax cool
The lessons from Ireland are clear: selective, targeted, and credible fiscal incentives can unlock supply and investment
The ITR in-house award winner delves into his dramatic novelisation of tax transformation, and declares that 'tax doesn’t need AI right now'
Recent news of job cuts at EY is symptomatic of how the PwC controversy has tarnished the reputation of the entire ‘big four’
Experts reportedly discussed extending the safe harbour to 2027 to give countries more time to legislate; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Greenberg Traurig made senior tax hires
Gift this article