Cambodia: New tax on shares gives possible glimpse of future developments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cambodia: New tax on shares gives possible glimpse of future developments

oconnell.jpg

Clint O’Connell

The introduction in December 2012 of a new category of registration tax under the 2013 Financial Management Law on share transfers in Cambodian entities, gives a possible glimpse as to how the Cambodian tax authorities may deal with existing loopholes in the tax regulations regarding the taxation of shares in Cambodian entities. In particular, the Cambodian tax regime does not provide a specific income tax regime for non-resident shareholders that realise a gain on shares issued by a Cambodian company, even though capital gains on shares are, as a matter of principle, taxable income under Article 7 of the Law on Taxation:

"The taxable profit is the net profit from all the results of all types of business operations including capital gains realised during the business operation or at the close of the business."

The practical explanation as to why non-residents do not have to declare and pay tax on profit on gains derived from share transfers in a Cambodian entity is tied up with the specific operation of the Cambodian tax regime. Under the Law on Taxation, the primary way that a taxpayer can declare tax is via the submission of a tax declaration which can only be accomplished if the taxpayer is:

  1. Registered with the General Department of Taxation;

  2. Required to register by virtue of carrying out economic activity or by having a "permanent establishment" in Cambodia; or

  3. Via a third party registered taxpayer under the withholding tax regime in Cambodia.

On the face of it, a non-resident will not have a permanent establishment in Cambodia merely by holding shares in a Cambodian company. We note that at the time of writing, Cambodia has not entered into any double taxation agreements (DTA) and the concept of permanent establishment is to be found in the domestic tax regulations of Cambodia. The concept of permanent establishment as found in Cambodia's domestic tax regulations closely resembles the standard language that is to be found in most DTA's.

In addition, the withholding tax regime in Cambodia does not contemplate a withholding tax on gains that arise from the sale of shares by non-residents. As a result, no actual tax liability exists for non-residents that make a gain on selling shares in a Cambodian entity who do not have a permanent establishment in Cambodia.

Given the desire of the Cambodian tax department to increase tax revenue in the future and the additional information they will now have regarding potential lost revenue on non-resident share transfers, by virtue of the new registration tax, we believe it highly probable that this existing loophole may shortly be closed.

As per the existing withholding tax regime in Cambodia and the recently introduced 0.1% registration tax on share transfers – it would be a fairly simple process for the Cambodian tax officials to introduce a regulation that required Cambodian entities, whose shares are being transferred by a non-resident shareholder, to either withhold or be liable to pay, the resulting tax on profit that may arise on any gain that is derived in respect to the transfer.

The only questions that really remain are as to how long it will be before the tax officials in Cambodia enact this change, what will be the exact form of the change, and what, if any, notice will be given to those affected.

Clint O'Connell (clint.oconnell@vdb-loi.com)

VDB Loi

Tel: +855 23 964 430

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
Gift this article