Cambodia: New tax on shares gives possible glimpse of future developments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cambodia: New tax on shares gives possible glimpse of future developments

oconnell.jpg

Clint O’Connell

The introduction in December 2012 of a new category of registration tax under the 2013 Financial Management Law on share transfers in Cambodian entities, gives a possible glimpse as to how the Cambodian tax authorities may deal with existing loopholes in the tax regulations regarding the taxation of shares in Cambodian entities. In particular, the Cambodian tax regime does not provide a specific income tax regime for non-resident shareholders that realise a gain on shares issued by a Cambodian company, even though capital gains on shares are, as a matter of principle, taxable income under Article 7 of the Law on Taxation:

"The taxable profit is the net profit from all the results of all types of business operations including capital gains realised during the business operation or at the close of the business."

The practical explanation as to why non-residents do not have to declare and pay tax on profit on gains derived from share transfers in a Cambodian entity is tied up with the specific operation of the Cambodian tax regime. Under the Law on Taxation, the primary way that a taxpayer can declare tax is via the submission of a tax declaration which can only be accomplished if the taxpayer is:

  1. Registered with the General Department of Taxation;

  2. Required to register by virtue of carrying out economic activity or by having a "permanent establishment" in Cambodia; or

  3. Via a third party registered taxpayer under the withholding tax regime in Cambodia.

On the face of it, a non-resident will not have a permanent establishment in Cambodia merely by holding shares in a Cambodian company. We note that at the time of writing, Cambodia has not entered into any double taxation agreements (DTA) and the concept of permanent establishment is to be found in the domestic tax regulations of Cambodia. The concept of permanent establishment as found in Cambodia's domestic tax regulations closely resembles the standard language that is to be found in most DTA's.

In addition, the withholding tax regime in Cambodia does not contemplate a withholding tax on gains that arise from the sale of shares by non-residents. As a result, no actual tax liability exists for non-residents that make a gain on selling shares in a Cambodian entity who do not have a permanent establishment in Cambodia.

Given the desire of the Cambodian tax department to increase tax revenue in the future and the additional information they will now have regarding potential lost revenue on non-resident share transfers, by virtue of the new registration tax, we believe it highly probable that this existing loophole may shortly be closed.

As per the existing withholding tax regime in Cambodia and the recently introduced 0.1% registration tax on share transfers – it would be a fairly simple process for the Cambodian tax officials to introduce a regulation that required Cambodian entities, whose shares are being transferred by a non-resident shareholder, to either withhold or be liable to pay, the resulting tax on profit that may arise on any gain that is derived in respect to the transfer.

The only questions that really remain are as to how long it will be before the tax officials in Cambodia enact this change, what will be the exact form of the change, and what, if any, notice will be given to those affected.

Clint O'Connell (clint.oconnell@vdb-loi.com)

VDB Loi

Tel: +855 23 964 430

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article