Cambodia: Independent contractor or employee

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cambodia: Independent contractor or employee

oconnell.jpg

Clint O’Connell

When hiring labour in Cambodia, it is essential to know what kind of relationship exists from a tax perspective. Importantly, the General Department of Taxation (GDT) will not base its view simply on the contract or agreement in place, but on the actual facts of the matter. The method and rate of taxation varies for employees and independent contractors – employees will be subject to Tax on Salary (TOS), whereas contractor's fees will be subject to withholding tax.

Tax on Salary

A resident will be subject to monthly deductions of tax withheld from salaries received from both Cambodian and foreign sources (in practice only Cambodian sourced salary can be declared). TOS rates are progressive, ending with a top marginal rate of 20% of the taxable base (see Table 1).

Table 1: Tax on Salary rates

Taxable salary (per month)

Progressive tax rate

Khmer Riel


Approx. USD (Translated at KHR4,000:US$1)

From 0

500,000

0

125

0%

From 500,001

1,250,000

125

313

5%

From 1,250,001

8,500,000

313

2,125

10%

From 8,500,001

12,500,000

2,125

3,125

15%

Over 12,500,001


3,125


20%

Withholding tax

A Cambodian registered entity will need to withhold either 15% or 14% withholding tax on payments made to resident or non-resident contractors respectively. There is an exemption for withholding tax payable to a resident contractor in the event that they provide a valid VAT invoice for their services rendered.

Employee or contractor?

Under Cambodia's Law on Taxation (LOT), there is no clear guidance on this matter. Thus, for tax purposes, as per Prakas No. 1173, an employer-employee relationship may be decided on the same basis of authority and subordination that is stated in the Cambodian Labour Law. Therefore, both by law and in practice, if a person is deemed to be an employee per the Labour Law, then it shall follow that the person shall also be an employee for tax purposes. The criteria listed in Section 1.2 of Prakas No. 1173 is mostly in line with the Labour Law criteria as follows:

"Compared with professional and other activities, employment activity is characterised by the state of subordination to the employer of the employee in fulfilling their activities. Shall be considered an employee and subject to the TOS a physical person who meets two of the following conditions:

  • The physical person is not a risk for non-payment of employment services rendered as long as he appears for work at a designated place and performs the tasks which are part of a general employment agreement whether written or not;

  • The physical person is not able to fix the time and place for rendering employment services;

  • The physical person is not required to have a significant investment in the equipment necessary to render employment services;

  • The physical person does not supply services to several recipients simultaneously."

When at least two of the four criteria are met by a physical person, they are then deemed to be an employee and their remuneration is subject to TOS.

Per the LOT, it is the duty of the employer to withhold the TOS. The definition of the term employer states that it is "including any government institution, any resident legal person, any resident pass-through, any permanent establishment in the Kingdom of Cambodia, any non-profit organisation, or any resident physical person carrying on a business". The term employee is defined as "any physical person receiving salary from their employment activity including any responsible officer or director of an enterprise, any governmental officer, any elected official except for members of parliament and senate".

Therefore, though an independent contractor is similar to an employee in that they are contracted to perform work for a person or entity, the independent contractor remains autonomous from the employer. However, the distinction between these two types of labour relationships can be difficult to determine under Cambodian law as no specific provisions exist regarding independent contractors.

Where a physical person is engaged to perform an employment activity on an as-needed basis, including temporary work such as for a particular campaign or a one-off event, there is no specific guidance for these instances in the LOT. In our opinion, there is little basis to treat part-time and temporary employees as independent contractors. Using the definition of employee above, the relationship between the employer and part-time employee is more likely to be considered an employer-employee relationship, as the part-time employee performs the work under "the direction and control" of the employer. It should be noted that the law does not specify what constitutes "direction and control".

In addition, assuming the worker does not make any substantial investment in buying any equipment required to perform the work, and that they are not at risk of non-payment if they go to work at the time and place determined by the employer, then based on Prakas No. 1173, an employer-employee relationship would be considered to exist.

The treatment of an employee as opposed to a contractor is not only important from a tax perspective. An employee has significant minimum rights as expressed in the Cambodian Labour Law with respect to leave requirements, severance pay and damages, whereas a contractor's rights are mainly expressed in the underlying contract agreement.

Consequently it is important that before entering into any document with an employee or contractor that their status is clearly spelt out taking into account the criteria outlined above.

Clint O'Connell (clint.oconnell@vdb-loi.com)

VDB Loi

Tel: +855 23 964 430

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article