European Commission advisers want improvements to IAS 12 proposal

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European Commission advisers want improvements to IAS 12 proposal

fotoflexer-photoefrag.jpg

More work is required before an amendment to IAS 12, the international accounting standard that deals with accounting for income taxes, is finalised, says EFRAG, the body that advises the European Commission on the technical quality of international financial reporting standards (IFRS).

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) outlined the proposal to change IAS 12 relating to the recognition of deferred tax assets for unrealised losses on available-for-sale debt securities in the Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010 – 2012 Cycle exposure draft, which was published on May 3.

EFRAG said it supported the IASB’s attempts to address the issue butit was concerned that the amendment potentially covers a much wider set of questions than just the recognition of deferred tax assets for unrealised losses on available-for-sale debt securities.

“We believe the IASB should perform additional outreach work and extended analysis to ensure that these amendments do not introduce new problems in areas where none exist to date,” EFRAG’s response added. “This is particularly the case because the interaction between IAS 12 Income Taxes and complex tax legislation in many jurisdictions has the potential to result in some anomalous outcomes.

“EFRAG believes that preparers differ in their understanding and interpretation of the basic mechanics of IAS 12. The wording of this amendment is also complex and will not in our view assist this understanding. Therefore, we believe that the IASB should improve the wording of the proposed amendments to IAS 12 to ensure their consistent application in the future.”

The IASB’s proposed amendment aims to clarify when an entity has to assess whether to recognise the tax effect of a deductible

ifrs.jpg
temporary difference as a deferred tax asset in combination with other deferred tax assets. The proposal states that if tax law only allows losses to be deducted against particular types of income “the entity must still assess a deferred tax asset in combination with other deferred tax assets, but only with such assets of the appropriate type”.

The proposal also clarifies that:

· taxable profit against which an entity assesses a deferred tax asset for recognition is the amount before any reversal of deductible temporary differences; and

· an action that results only in the reversal of existing deductible temporary differences is not a tax planning opportunity. To qualify as a tax planning opportunity, the action needs to create or increase taxable profit.

The period for comments on the exposure draft closed on September 5 and the amendments are set to take effect for annual periods beginning on or after January 1 2014.









more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
Gift this article